Search Documents

By Florian B. Janoski

The annual consumption of electric blasting caps in the United States approaches 100,000,000, so, over the last eleven to twelve years about one billion have been used. The author has made hazard assessment measurements in connection with proposed electric blasting operations in many places: under a giant, operating electrical generating station, under some of the highest voltage power lines in the country, and around many large electrical distribution substations. Electric blasting was safely conducted in all instances. Measurements of stray current, and of pickup under high voltage power lines are easily made, but it was always a more complex chore to make a good radio frequency hazard assessment "close in" to a high power RF transmitting source.

Jan 1, 1977

By G. R. Adhikari

A major part of mineral production comes from surface mining and there has been a rapid growth in this sector with the deployment of high capacity equipment. The importance of blast design combining appropriately both theoretical methods and practical approach has been well recognized in the field of surface mining. It is known that blast design has a direct consequence on productivity, safety and economic viability of these mines. Blasting is the most common method of breaking rocks in mining, but it has to be cost-effective. In coal production, for instance, drilling and blasting account for 25 percent of the total procution cost. In hard rock mining, the cost of drilling and blasting is about 40 percent. Due to ever increasing concern for cost-effectiveness together with environmental consciousness, designing blasts for each application has now become a stringent requirement and indeed a challenging task as well.

Jan 1, 2002

By J Edmund Hay

Previous work by the Bureau of Mines to develop a test for determining the initiating strength of commercial detonators has been modified and extended. Recently reported results by the Bureau used a homogeneous liquid explosive to avoid the complicating effects of inhomogeneities; however, due to the belief that there may be essential differences between the initiation mechanisms of simple liquids and multi-phase mixtures and the fact that almost all commercial explosives are in the latter category, the experiments have been modified accordingly. The acceptor explosive is now a mixture of explosive-grade ammonium nitrate (AN) prills, methanol (MeOH) and nitromethane (NM). An additional change has been the use of the United Nations (UN) cap sensitivity test configuration in which the detonation witness is the degree of compression of a lead block, which is a quantitative measure of the response of the explosive. Results indicate that this mixture has sufficient range of sensitivities to be useful in comparing the strength of commercial electric detonators.

Jan 1, 1993

By Brian Wingfield, Rick Givens, Greg Williams

Many technological advancements have been made in explosive products and applications over the last 15 years resulting in productivity and cost gains. However, the applications of total energy (engine horsepower) in the majority of rotary drilling technology, has remained virtually unchanged over that period. While advancements have been made in components, efficiency, and types of hydraulic systems used on drills, the application of current hydraulic technology to improve drilling productivity has not been interactive with end users. This paper will investigate how traditional design assumptions, regarding typical application of horsepower in current rotary drill systems, can actually limit productivity.

Jan 1, 1996

By Marco Antonio Falquete

Conventional detonators and blasting caps make use, as igniters, of flame-shock-, andfriction-sensitive primary explosives, such as lead azide, lead styphnate, mercury fulminate, etc, most of them severe toxic and environmental contaminants. Sensitivity of primary explosives is one of the main causes of injuries and fatalities in explosives industry and in field applications. Intense research for a reliable, safe, and environmental-friendly non-primary-explosives detonator was conducted by the industry in the last years. A new detonator is presented, containing no primary explosive, employing only environmental-friendly substances while keeping reliability of performance. A series of performance tests is executed in prototypes of different output energies, including initiation by flame, shock tube, thermo tube (IBQ’s proprietary spark-generating tube, presented at 2005 ISEE Conference), energy transfer reliability, and extreme environmental conditions (according to MIL-STD 331B, test C1 standards). Results are compared, when pertinent, with standard blasting caps of different energy outputs, and with standard primary explosives.

Jan 1, 2007

By T. Palangio

Most blasters wouldn’t think of initiating a shot without a seismograph to record vibration and air blast results. Some might even measure the velocity of detonation but few surprisingly record the event on video, photo document loading conditions or take pictures before and after the shot. This paper discusses digital imaging, the equipment, methods, techniques and information that can be learned from digital pictures taken in the field during blasting operations. The guy who said “a picture is worth a thousand words” probably understated it.

Jan 1, 2008

By Sheila Luchansky, F M. Babcock, Daniel M. Sanders

A cooperative effort between a blasting vibration consultant, a blasting contractor, and personnel from the City of Las Vegas has dramatically reduced complaints from residential areas near developmental blasting projects. The principal methods used involved the preparation of an informative video recording which presents various aspects of the blasting operations, the design of a distinctive flyer which is attached to residential doors, and pre-blast meetings for information dissemination.

Jan 1, 1993

By Paul Worsey, Ron Ecklecamp, Scott G. Giltner, Ronnie Inman, Terry Drechsler

A blast monitoring program conducted at Chemical Lie Company’s new lime calcining facility near Ste. Genevieve, Missouri is discussed. The purpose was to develop blasting criteria for the construction and operation of the lime plant within the quarry operated by Tower Rock Stone. Further, it was imperative to accommodate production requirements into the blasting criteria. The major concern was the effect of blasting on the curing of green concrete during the construction of the storage silos and kiln stacks. In addition to discussing the susceptibility of curing concrete to blast vibrations, the paper also details how this varies with time.

Jan 1, 1996

By Syed M. Tariq, John W. Wilson, Paul N. Worsey

The position of a major joint in relation to a blasthole has a significant effect in presplitting. Broad research into the combined effects of firing two decoupled blastholes has been performed in the past. The effects of joints simulated between two blastholes has also been evaluated. However, no attempt has been made to investigate the splitting effects produced by firing a single decoupled blasthole. This paper presents the results of such an investigation.

Jan 1, 1996

By S. P. Singh, Turgut Yalcin

The physical characteristics of blasted rock are fundamental variables affecting the economics of mining operations and are in fact the basis for evaluating the quality of a blast. A study was designed with the objective of quantifying the effect of muck size distribution on scooping operations in a mine.

Jan 1, 2002

By Andrew Drake, Mark Burchard, Peter Bellairs

The Astec Bluerock Quarry is excavating an extremely difficult to blast rock type due to its highly variable jointing density that leads to excessive oversize. A drill and blast benchmarking exercise led to eight recommendations to minimise this problem. Quarry personnel instigated a continuous improvement blasting program, that has implemented six out of eight recommendations, resulting in a large reduction in the oversize and increased crusher throughputs for a marginal 7% increase in drill and blast costs. Unit costs have reduced by an estimated 10%.

Jan 1, 1998

By Edward Fitch

The DOE is evaluating Yucca Mountain, Nevada as a potential site for disposal of high level nuclear waste. Yucca Mountain is located approximately 160 km northwest of Las Vegas on the western edge of the Nevada Test Site and the Nellis Air Force Range. An exploratory tunnel has been constructed through Yucca Mountain for site characterization. A controlled drilling and blasting technique, smooth wall blasting, was used to excavate the TBM starter tunnel and alcoves off the main tunnel to provide areas for scientific investigation. Fundamental to the blasting program has been the use of two blast design equations used in concert to minimize blast damage to the surrounding rock mass. The first of these equations was developed by Roger Holmberg and estimates near-field peak particle velocity that is the basis for minimizing blast damage to the host rock. The second of these equations was developed by B. H. Sanden and provides bore hole pressure estimation which allows controls to minimize crushing of the rock mass along the perimeter yet allowing enough force to create tensile failure between perimeter bore holes. This is key to the smooth wall blasting technique. To date, essentially the same controlled drilling and blasting program has been in place for all excavation requiring controlled drilling and blasting at the ESF. The controlled drilling and blasting program uses an iterative process to achieve continuous improvement in the blast rounds. This involves interaction between Architect and Engineer (A/E), Constructor, and Testing Coordination O&e (TCO) to ensure each blast round successfully meets the expectations of affected participants. The A/E requested that the TCO provide validation of the near-field peak particle velocity estimation under the Construction Monitoring Program. Data gathered under this program were reduced by statistical analysis and used to verify blast design parameters and provide a site specific blast damage relationship.

Jan 1, 2000

By Midori Sakamoto, Nobuaki Sakuma, Tsuyoshi Murashita

Recently, tunnel blasting works near the residential area and existing building are increasing and environmental problems caused by vibration have become serious public concern. In order to solve these problems, blasting works have been conducted with segmented blasting and reduce advance per round. However, with these blasting, work efficiency is not obtained, and regrettably the cost and risk of accident tend to increase. We developed a new controlled tunnel blasting technique with electronic delay detonator. Electronic delay detonator can supply extremely large range of delay period which could not be achieved with conventional pyrotechnical delay detonators. We utilized advantages in initiating hole by hole over entire tunnel face at the same round. Much seismic data obtained from tunnel blasting with conventional detonator was statistically analyzed in order to find average duration time of vibration caused by a single hole initiation. Numerical simulation using sample waves from a single hole initiation was carried out in order to find an optimum delay time which can separate vibration in each hole initiation and without decreasing blast performance. Trial blasting was conducted to examine the correctness of optimum delay time obtained from numerical simulation. This blasting technique was applied to an actual tunnel construction. This tunnel is 2 lane automobile tunnel with a total length of 659 meters and internal cross section of 70 square meters. The purpose of the use of blasting technique on occasion, was the protection of fresh water reservoirs directly above the tunnel, and to keep the effect on local private houses to a minimum. The vibration level against this station was limited under 20 mm/see P.V.V. With this blasting, the tunnel construction was completed without exceeding the limited vibration level, with minimum cost and construction time.

Jan 1, 1998

This is the story of a blast - not a large blast by todays standards as it only involved a total of approximately 50 cubic yards of rock. Nor did this blast involve any new or revolutionary blasting technique or require involved analysis or the applications of rock mechanics theories. Instead, it was a blast that involved the tried-and-true principles of good blasting: precise alignment of blastholes; selection of explosives and detonators designed for the conditions encountered; extreme care in loading and hooking up and the use of several ingenious devices and techniques to achieve the proper loading and firing of the blast

Jan 1, 1976

By James W. Reil, Douglas A. Anderson

Common wisdom has it that a blast which breaks rock efficiently should-generate less ground vibration. In practice, however, this idea has not been-rigorously tested. In a previous paper presented at an SEE meeting[1] we described a method for-controlling vibration using delays. The method is very effective in controlling-annoying low-frequency ground vibration. We noted that observed ground-vibration differs in some respects from that predicted by adding single-charge-waveforms.

Jan 1, 1988

By Michael D. Duffy, Martin W. Chenoweth

"Tenn Luttrell Company (TLC) is a major lime and limestone producer in the eastTennessee area. The property, which isreferred to as the Chesney Mine, has been mined from the surface and underground overthe past 20 years. The ore body consists of three major zones of chemical grade limestonewhich lay at a dip of 30 _ 65 degrees. In July of 1989, Tenn Luttrell Company made thedecision to reopen the underground operations which had been suspended during a time ofincreased surface mining."

Jan 1, 1993

By William E. Hill

The blasting program at the Valdez Creek Placer Mine must deal with challenging situations throughout the year. During the short summer, extreme water conditions must be confronted, while the winter months present problems of a different nature, where the overburden freezes to a depth of up to 18 feet. These obstacles require techniques borrowed from hardrock blasting combined with creative experimentation to overcome.

Jan 1, 1994

By Wendell W. Harris, Stanley J. Vitton

In the United States each year it has been estimated that expansive soils cause approximately $9.0 billion in damage to buildings, roads, airports, and other facilities. This figure alone exceeds the damage estimate for earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, and hurricanes combined. Unfortunately, some cases of expansive soil damage (swelling) are blamed on rock blasting operations if the blasting operations are located within the immediate area. While simple tests, such as the Atterberg limits test, can characterize a soil as expansive, it does not necessarily answer the question whether the foundation soils are causing distresses to a structure. In particular, it appears that once a soil has been labeled as nonexpansive it is no longer considered as a problem soil, in which case blast vibrations become the prime suspect.

Jan 1, 1996

By R Mancini, G Borla

This paper analyses the first results of a part of an EEC research project ("Blasting control for underground mining"). This research that involves three universities (Paris, Torino and Leoben) has been carried out at the Eisenerz test mine in Austria. In the experimental campaign here reviewed, parallel holes rounds have been fired "decomposed", which means with enough delay between the explosions of the successive blastholes groups to allow for a separate evaluation of their effects on the rock. The seismic effects have been recorded by geophones placed at small distance from the blast, the aim being to find out correlations between the features of the seismogram and the good or poor performance of the single blastholes, or of the groups pertaining to the same delay. Indeed, the seismogram is the only safe and cheaply obtainable description of what happens during the blast. The seismogram should be transformed in a diagnostic tool in the round 'calibration' stage, and in a routine control device during excavation.

Jan 1, 1995

By K Ramachandra Rao

This paper explains the methodology for assessing the efficiency of rockmass fragmentation by explosive blasting, from ground vibration frequency spectrum analysis of the blast event. Explosives are used in the mining, quarrying and construction industries for fragmenting rockmass to a suitable size. When an explosive charge is detonated, in addition to fragmenting the rockmass, it will also generate ground vibration and air vibrations. Efficiency of a blast depend upon percentage of blast energy wasted in generating ground vibrations and air vibrations.

Jan 1, 1994