Search Documents

By Cecil E. Lester

Since the advent of coal mining, the minimal lighting in the under¬ground working place has been an obstacle to the safe and efficient performance of the miner's many tasks. Compounding this problem is the fact that the machines being operated in the working place are so large that the vertical and horizontal clearances around the machinery are severely limited. Consequently, in these poorly lighted and congested working places, the machine operator is unable to utilize his peripheral vision. He cannot see hazards as they develop and, too often, cannot react in time to avoid serious injury or death to himself or his fellow miners. The greatest hazard to miners inby the last open crosscut is from falls of roof which are often preceded by warning signs such as falling rock fragments, roof supports taking weight, or a sudden reduction in the height of the working place. These warning signs often go undectected because the machine operator's attention is focused on the small circle of light emitted from his cap lamp. Congress recognized the illumination deficiencies, and, in the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, charged the Secretary of the Interior with the authority and responsibility for development and promulgation of minimum standards for illuminating working places in coal mines. These standards have been developed and, as stated in the April 1, 1976 Notice, Federal Register, Volume 41, No. 64, will be promulgated on October 1, 1976, as mandatory regulations under Section 75.1719, Title 30, Code of Federal Regulations. The regulations require that the designated surfaces within the miner's normal field of vision be illuminated to 0.06 foot-lamberts while self¬propelled mining equipment is being operated in the working places. The term "working place" is defined in the Act as "the area of a coal mine inby the last open crosscut".

Jan 1, 1976

By R. V. Ramani, A. S. C. Owili-eger

List of Numbers

Jan 1, 1974

By C. B. Manula, R. L. Sanford, R. A. Rivell

A - Contains the coordinate pair information for deriving the co¬efficients of the 3rd degree polynomial which approximates the loading station equation. C(N) - Coefficients for third degree approximating polynomial. I - General DO LOOP variable. K - Position in BRANCH of next character. L - Format specification in DEFINE FILE statement. X - Uniform displacement for random uniform number. Y - Load increment At. AO-A3 - Coefficients of approximating polynomial for loading station equation. GR - Grade direction, or grade resistance. IQ - Counts quadruples of distance grade speed and end of route for determining total distance. IT - Intersection counter in XXXDEF. Il - Station number trip is leaving. Jl - Station number for trip destination. J2-J8 - Motor assignments and functions for given trip. KK - Location of starting grade and distance in DISTGR KK - Position of decimal point in real number. KZ - DO LOOP variable for motor assignment check. LL - Location of ending grade and distance in DISTGR. Ll - Position in IECB of station satisfied. L3 - Next available position for IECB sort. MM - Flag for printing the failure of sanding to overcome slippage. NN - Trip destination in MOTSER RR - Rolling Resistance. XK - Station level or type.

Jan 1, 1974

By David A. Monaghan, Kenneth R. Maser, Adi R. Gurdar, D. Randolph Berry

APPENDIX D DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF ACOUSTIC SEAL CHECKER THEORY 1. Introduction In Section 7 of the report the acoustic seal checker concept was described in a general manner and the parameters which affect the signal level at the microphone were discussed briefly. In this appendix the theoretical basis will be presented and the experimental program described which permitted the extension of the theory into practice. The basic goal of the acoustic seal checker is to relate the reduction in sound pressure level to the size of the residual hole in the fly ash barrier. The smallest hole size that may be measured is determined by the signal to noise ratio, where the noise in this case includes the ambient noise in the mine, the internal microphone noise and the sound transmitted from the acoustic source via the flanking paths through corridors adjacent to the one being sealed. The latter source of noise can be discriminated against, at the expense of increased complexity of the acoustic system, by employing a pulsed source and pulse gating of the microphone signal set to accept sound via the barrier path and to reject the delayed flanking path signals. In order that the acoustic system be insensitive to precise source and microphone location and to permit assessment of system performance on an acoustic power flow basis, a broad frequency band of pseudo-random noise is emitted by the loudspeaker source. The preferred frequency range must be determined, the advantage of a directive source must be assessed, and the necessity

Jan 1, 1973

[ ]

Jan 1, 1997

By David Hoadley, Kenneth R. Maser, Ashok B. Boghani, James E. Billar, D. Randolph Berry, Mackenzie Burnett, Robert H. Trent

APPENDIX G TABLE IX MINE A 1 General Total Employees 3000 Maximum No, of Men Underground/Shift 800 Shifts/Day 3 Type of Ore Copper Daily Production (TPD) 25,000 Mining Method Room and Pillar Vein Dip/Thickness l0°/l5 ft Number of Levels/Max Depth 1/0 to 1800 ft 2 Haulage, Conveyances and Travelway Main Haulage Rubber Tire/10 miles belts Man-Ways - Typical Route of Travel to most Remote Sites Rubber Tired Vehicles Hoists - Capacity/Speed/Depth Depth under construction 3 Ventilation 2,500,000 cfm - 5 surface fans 4 Compressed Air N/A cfm 10" and 12" lines 5 Incendiary Storage 2 day powder 1000 gal fuel oil 6 Communications 1 complete system - all shops, dinner areas, and feeder/breaker stations 2 partial systems 7 Escapeway- Systems Man Check System Section boss log and punch cards Alarm System Mine phones with paging system Posting of Escape Route Maps No Escape Signs Every intersection, fluorescent paint Evacuation Drills 2/yr/shift Refuge Chambers - 1 cinder block - No longer required

Jan 1, 1976

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

MINE VENTILATION NETWORK ANALYSIS

Jan 1, 1977

By Craig Haase

A. Introduction

Jan 1, 2003

By R. V. Ramani, C. B. Manula, A. Owili-Eger

• MINE VENTILATION NETWORK PROBLEM (NATURAL SPLITTING; FIXED • QUANTITY BRANCHES; METHANE SIMULATION; NETWORK TOPOLOGY REVISION; • ABSOLUTE PRESSURE) • NFIXB = NO. OF FIXED QUANTITY BRANCHES • DD(I) = AIR QUANTITY ASSIGNED TO FIXED QUANTITY BRANCH I, IN KCFP • NFBPF = NO. OF FIXED QUANTITY BRANCHES PLUS FAN • NFBPFG = NO. OF FIXED QUANTITY BRANCHES PLUS FAN PLUS METHANE • EMISSION BRANCHES • NBWNVP = NO. OF BRANCHES WITH NATURAL.VENTILATION PRESSURE • NVP(I) = NATURAL VENTILATION PRESSURE ASSOCIATED WITH • THE I-TH BRANCH • NF = NUMBER OF FANS • NB = NUMBER OF BRANCHES • MAXIT = MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS • MAXJ = MAXIMUM NUMBER OF JUNCTIONS • NJ = NUMBER OF JUNCTIONS INVOLVED IN THE SOLUTION * NM = NUMBER OF MESHES • NP = NO. OF POINTS TO DESIGNATE FAN CHARACTERISTIC * Q = QUANTITY OF AIR FLOW IN KCFM • R = RESISTANCE OF AN AIRWAY • WIDTH = AIRWAY DIMENSION • LENGTH = AIRWAY DIMENSION • HEIGHT = AIRWAY DIMENSION • SUMNVP = SUMMATION OF NATURAL VENTILATION PRESSURE FOR ANY MESH • X (I) = QUANTITY OF AIR, IN KCFM, ASSOCIATED WITH THE I-TB POINT • ON A FAN CHARACTERISTIC • E = ERROR FOR CONVERGENCE • FF = FRICTION FACTOR • FX(I) = FAN PRESSURE, INS INCHES OF WATER GAGE, CORRESPONDING • • TO A QUANTITY X(I) • H = HEAD LOSS IN INCHES OF WATER GAGE • I = BRANCH NUMBER • J, J1, J2 = JUNCTION, J1 AND J2 ARE TWO NODES WHICH DEFINE A • BRANCH • KEY = NO. WHICH SIGNALS THE TYPE OF FAN CHARACTERISTIC TO BE • EXPECTED

Jan 1, 1975

By R. V. Ramani, V. T. Burgos, J. A. McClay

The data for Test I describes an underground bituminous coal mine operation in a 48 inch seam, with an estimated production rate of 1,056,000 tons per year. The system includes four continuous mining sections, conveyor belt haulage, and a rail network for supply and personnel transportation. This section illustrates the input data sequence and the various report formats which may be selected for the printing of results. As explained earlier, at the present time, the elements of the Cost Data Library must be read in with the regular data input. Thus, in the input data listing, immediately following the required user input, are cards which contain the inputs of the cost library. Examination of the cost reports indicate the absence of cost values for some categories for which the system would normally be expected to incur costs. This situation has arisen due to the format of the cost data provided in the U. S. Bureau of Mines reports. An example of this is the charge of $20/ton for brattice cloth while no charge is indicated for stoppings. The test report data provided a single figure for ventilation cost without a supplemental breakdown. Thus the cost indicated for brattice cloth is actually the total ventilation cost. These explanations hold true for the data input and output for Test II, Appendix III.

Jan 1, 1975

By R. V. Ramani, C. B. Manula, A. Owili-Eger

PART 1 THE INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA AND THE MINE SCHEMATIC SHOWING THE FLOWS FROM COMPUTER SOLUTIONS FOR APPLICATION I

Jan 1, 1975

By Karl J. C. Harries

"The following is an outline or check sheet of some things that might be looked at when considering the concept of a royalty or royalty provisions. It is not intended as a guide to what is right or wrong (that is for the parties to decide). It does not replace the discussions in this work and is not intended to be a complete or exhaustive compilation of matters to be considered. It presumes that you are familiar with the basic concepts of royalties and has been included as an aide memoire only. Use it as such, with caution and common sense, and amend it to suit your needs. Remember also that brevity can result in inaccuracy or imprecision. This is a danger in many points below.The section references are for the sections where the matter is the main subject of the section – see the index for other sections.Royalty TypesNet Proceeds [§§ 5.8.; 11.4.]• No accepted or understood meaning within industry.• Literal meaning, if not defined, would imply “net operating profit”.• Often defined as net profit with revenue base of proceeds from sale of product.• Should not be used without detailed and clear definition. Net Operating Profit [§§ 5.8.; 11.4. – referred to only]• Net profit without recoupment of pre-production expenditures.• Revenue base: usually proceeds from sale of product.• Operating costs deductible.• Some reserves may be permitted.• Recoupment of some post-production capital expenditures may be permitted.• Not often seen as basis for royalties in Canada."

Jan 1, 2003

By Karl J. C. Harries

"The Table of Contents that follows is only an example and is the Table of Contents from an actual negotiated agreement. It is merely intended to show how an agreement might be set out and the nature of possible provisions. As a negotiated agreement the format was dictated by the negotiations. It is not offered as a precedent of what should be contained in a joint venture agreement (“JVA”), the “proper” sequence of Articles, or a complete listing of the contents of joint venture agreements generally. The set-up used for an agreement should be decided by the parties and be one they consider flows in a logical and workable sequence. This example sets out the “deal” first, followed by the provisions relating to how work is to be carried out and then by administrative provisions necessary to make the agreement work. If you are more comfortable with, say, having the Committee provisions at the beginning, by all means have it drafted that way -- you are going to have to live with the agreement and work under it.Notes:1. The Table of Contents provisions appear in bold print. The italicized sections are annotations, which have been provided in some cases where the heading may not clearly describe the contents. They are not intended to be comprehensive, but refer to some specific matters that are considered to be of interest or to need some clarification.2. The subject matter of many of the articles and paragraphs is discussed or commented upon in the text of the book. Some of section cross-references have been provided. Such references are only to sections where the topic is a principal subject and no attempt has been made to provide a comprehensive indexing.3. Although this particular agreement is a three-party agreement, *B* and *C*, the Owners, are required to act as a unit (see para. 1.09. – § 8.44.), making the agreement effectively a two-party agreement. The parties insisted upon having a decision-making Committee and structuring the agreement accordingly. As is explained in § 8.11., such an arrangement is not recommended and can result in problems.5. See also §§ 8.24., 8.41. and 14.13. for discussions on tables of contents, summaries, and headings."

Jan 1, 2003

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

MINE VENTILATION NETWORK ANALYSIS

Jan 1, 1977

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

MINE VENTILATION NETWORK ANALYSIS

Jan 1, 1977

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

Le Système International d'Unités (SI) Equivalents of Common United States Units Length 1 ft (foot) = 0.30480 m Mass 1 lbm (pound mass) = 0.45359 kg Force 1 lb (pound) = 4.4482 N Volume Flow Rate 1 cfm = 0.00047195 m3/s Mass Flow Rate 1 lbm/min = 0.00756 kg/s Pressure (wg at 20° C) 1 inch wg (water gage) = 248.36 N/m2 1 inch wg = 248.36 Pa Power 1 hp (horsepower) = 0.74570 kW Energy 1 ft-lb = 1.3558 J Torque 1 lb-inch = 0.11298 N-m

Jan 1, 1977

By Dan Nilsson

INTRODUCTION A company must have an objective, and that usually is to earn money. In some countries an objective can also be to reduce unemployment in an area or to develop nonindustrialized areas. Government-owned companies can also have as an objective that of serving the com¬munity. This discussion is limited to the consideration of normal companies wanting to earn money. Such an objective, however, has to be defined in more detail. It is not satisfactory only to maximize the total annual profit from, for example, a mining project. In comparison with most other branches, the mining in¬dustry is very capital intensive. When starting a new project, the mining company must invest a lot of money in mines, ore treatment plants, etc. It is normally many years before any income is received from the ore. Fig. 14 illustrates the payments for a new mining proj¬ect with an expected lifetime of 10 years. Whether this project is a profitable one depends on a lot of things. If the company has a shortage of money, it can be impossible to finance the project. Even if the company has enough money, the management may think that perhaps the project may not return the money fast enough. Such limitations will not be discussed here. Suppose that the company has internal funds from its own operation or can borrow them. Since the mining company must invest the money in advance, it is not satisfactory only to add all of the costs during the mine's lifetime and compare them with the total income during the lifetime. The company must include the time value of the capital. In this appendix, the basic investment theory neces¬sary to judge the profitability and costs of mining proj¬ects will be discussed. INVESTMENT THEORY Time Value of Money If a private person has a dollar and puts it into a bank, he or she will receive interest. If the interest rate is r%, the value after one year will be $(1 + r), after 2 years $(I + r)2 , etc. The interest rate represents the time value of money. If the same person wants to have $1 in the bank af¬ter one year, he or she has to put $(1 + r)-1 in the bank today. If the person wants $1 after 2 years, it is neces¬sary to put $(1 + r)-2 into the bank today, etc. So one dollar today is worth more than one dollar tomorrow. It is, of course, not correct to compare money at differ¬ent times since each dollar has a different value. It is necessary to transform all payments to the same point in time. That is called the calculation of the capital value of a cash flow, and to do this an interest rate is used. In the same way, the cash flow from a project like that shown in Fig. 14 can be translated to any other point in time. Most common is to translate all payments to the beginning of the mining period. That capital value is often called the present capital value. Interest Rate What interest rate will the company use? A com¬pany, just like an individual, has the basic alternatives of keeping its money in the bank and receiving interest, or borrowing money from a bank and paying an interest rate. The interest rate represents the time value of money for the company. If the company has a shortage of money, or many good potential investment projects, it has to use a higher interest rate than if it has a lot of money available. Most companies also increase their interest rate as a hedge against the risk involved by using money for uncertain investments, because of taxes, etc. Capital Value When the interest rate has been decided, it is possi¬ble to estimate the capital value of a project. Here the discussion will be limited to the estimation of present capital values. Suppose that one wants to know the present capital value of $1 (Fig. 15), which will be received after n years. To transform it n years back in time, one must multiply it by the factor (1 + r)-, where r is the inter¬est rate the company uses. Table 1 gives these factors for different years and interest rates. Example: At the end of year 5 a mining company has to invest $50 million in a new mine. What is the present capital value at the end of year 0? The company uses an interest rate of 15%a.

Jan 1, 1982

By G. Grassmück

The question of whether the air curtain principle could be used under conditions prevailing in Canadian metal mines was investigated. A vertical, portable BERRY air curtain was tested, at first in a wind tunnel built at Ecole Polytechnique at full scale (8-by 8-ft cross section) to simulate a drift and its lateral connections, and then in the haulage ways of a metal mine under actual conditions. The results permit us to predict under what conditions this type of air curtain is capable of acting as an air stopping or flow regulator and how it could be further developed.

Jan 1, 1969

By R. Heikkilä

As a part of a large research and development program in Finland, a system calibration for an UAV measurement method having practical experiments in a Jorvas Railway Yard design and construction project. The Railway yard construction are was measured using an UAV measurement device by Smartplanes (Smartone) and using some reference points measured by a GNSS device. The measured data was cleaned, combined and adjusted through Least Squares Optimization using the software developed by a Finnish company Pieneering Oy. As references, two different laser scans as well as total station surveys were used. For applicability evaluation, the accuracy of measurement, the reliability of measurement, and the economy of measurement were used. Based on the comparisons, the achieved precision of the UAV measurement was high, instead the accuracy of measurement was not sufficient in this case. The principle of this photogrammetric measurement includes a lot of redundant observations making it possible to achieve a high level of reliability. The economy in this Railway Yard Design project was not able to achieve.

Aug 1, 2013

By A Jewbali, R Perry, R Inglis, L Allen

"The use of conditional simulation to characterise mine plan uncertainty is increasing for the assessment of risk in mining projects. While the development of grade uncertainty profiles is relatively straightforward and can be validated using standard geostatistical techniques, the addition of geological uncertainty to evaluate total risk remains problematic. Some of the problems associated with geological uncertainty methods include the clustering of data in favourable geologic units, difficulty in training image definition and the inability to address change of support issues for categorical variables. Despite these obstacles, the importance of geological uncertainty as a contributor to total uncertainty has prompted Newmont to explore and evaluate the use of various techniques (and combinations of techniques) on different deposit types.Two orogenic deposits of different geological complexity were selected for the study: Subika, a shear zone-hosted deposit, and Merian, a deposit containing gold mineralisation associated with quartz vein zones and stockwork within which are found higher-grade quartz breccia zones. Newmont trialled various categorical simulation approaches to determine the applicability of these methods for each deposit type and the effect of parameter choice on the width of the uncertainty interval. Some of the techniques that were trialled include multiple point statistics methods, sequential indicator simulation using local probabilities as well as variations of these methodologies.The goals of this study included: gaining an understanding of which techniques may work best in which deposit types gaining an understanding of the intricacies of each method gaining an understanding of the effect that each method has on total uncertainty analysis.This paper presents a comparison of the various techniques and makes recommendations for their use in uncertainty analysis.CITATION:Jewbali, A, Perry, R, Allen, L and Inglis, R, 2014. Applicability of categorical simulation methods for assessment of mine plan risk, in Proceedings Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning Symposium 2014, pp 85–98 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne)."

Nov 24, 2014