Search Documents
Search Again
Search Again
Refine Search
Refine Search
- Relevance
- Most Recent
- Alphabetically
Sort by
- Relevance
- Most Recent
- Alphabetically
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Mr. Stetefeldt's paper on the inaccuracy of the commercial assay for silver (see p. 530)Prof. H. O. Hofman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Mass. (communication to the Secretary): When Mr. Stetefeldt quotes me as saying that " silver-assays are uniformly made by scorificat
Jan 1, 1895
-
Bridgeport Paper - Discussion (continued) of Mr. Rickard's paper on the gold stamp-mill (see vol. xxiii., pp. 137 and 545)Note by the Secretary.-—In the preceding communication of Mr. Rickard, in the present discussion, as printed in Trans., xxiii., the loss of quicksilver at Pestarena, reported on p. 569, as 230 and 234
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Prof. Roberts-Austen's paper on recent advances in pyrometry (see vol. xxiii., p. 407)President H. M. Howe, Boston, Mass. (communication to the Secretary): Le Chatelier's pyrometer is certainly a most convenient and accurate instrument for the laboratory, and one that may be used
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Prof. Richards's paper on close sizing before jigging (see p. 409)Henry LOUIS, London, England (communication to the Secretary) : Prof. Richards's paper has impressed me as highly valuable. Without entering upon any discussion of it as careful and thorough as i
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion (continued) of Mr. Potter's paper on American blast-furnace practice (see vol. xxiii., pp. 370 and 577)James Gayley, Braddock, Pa. (communication to the Secretary) : Mr. Potter has made reference to our practice at the Edgar Thomson works in the direction of increasing the life of the lining, and menti
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion (continued) of Mr. Douglas's paper on American improvements in ore-crushing, concentration, etc. (see vol. xxii, pp. 321 and 647)C. E. Dewey, Georgetown, Colo. (communication to the Secretary) : In his remarks on crushing-machinery, Mr. Douglas says (Twins., xxii., p. 322): "To insure a smaller and more uniform size of parti
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion : Coal-Dust in Mine-explosions (see Mr. Glenn's paper, p. 195)E. E. Russell Tratman, New York City (communication to the Secretary): Mr. Glenn's paper brings up again the question of the part played by coal-dust in colliery-explosions. In the discussion of
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Mr. Becker's paper on the torsional theory of joints (see p. 130)President Howe: It is, of course, not easy to discuss off-hand the paper which Mr. Becker has presented with so much lucidity. I will only make one remark, which is outside of the line of his argument
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Mr. Lychenheim's paper on phosphorus in coal and coke (seep. 66)Since this paper was written, some changes have taken place, materially reducing the cost of iron-making as estimated in the text. These are chiefly reductions in the prices of ore and fuel. The charc
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Mr. Sheafer's paper on the re-working of anthracite culm-banks (see p. 364)In answer to inquiries from members, Mr. Sheafer said that the culm-banks of which his paper gave the shipments were of about the average quality of the banks in the Mahanoy region of the Schuylkill f
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion (continued) of Prof. Pošepný's paper on the genesis of ore-deposits (see vol. xxiii., pp. 197 and 587)Discussion, at the Virginia Beach Meeting, February, 1894, of the Paper of Prof. Posepny. (Trans., xxiii., 197, 587.) Including communications subsequently received. a T. A. Rickard, Denver, Colora
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Postscript to Mr. Kennedy's paper on iron-ores of East Texas (see p. 258)Since this paper was written, some changes have taken place, materially reducing the cost of iron-making as estimated in the text. These are chiefly reductions in the prices of ore and fuel. The charc
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Mr. Leggett's paper on transmission of electrical power (see p. 315)FREderick H. Davis, Electrical Engineer of the Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co., in charge of the plant at Bodie, Cal. (communication to the Secretary): I beg to offer, to complete the info
Jan 1, 1895
-
Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Dr. Waldo's paper on aluminum-bronze (see p. 525)President Howe : It is not so clear to me that the facts which Dr. Waldo brings forward really argue that the nature of the combination between copper and aluminum differs from that of the combination
Jan 1, 1895
-
Bridgeport Paper - Discussion of Prof. Kemp's paper on the Lancaster Gap nickel-mine (see p. 620)E. E. Olcott, New York City: Prof. Kemp's valuable description of the Lancaster Gap mine is in line with many other able contributions on the origin of mineral deposits that the Institute has lat
Jan 1, 1895
-
Bridgeport Paper - The Nickel Mine at Lancaster Gap. Pennsylvania, and the Pyrrhotite Deposits at Anthony's Nose, on the Hudson (see Discussion, p. 883)By J. F. Kemp
The use of nickel-steel has directed increasing interest of late towards the deposits of nickel, and at the same time the parallel advance in our knowledge of the basic igneous rocks has rendered thes
Jan 1, 1895
-
Bridgeport Paper - Discussion of Mr. Winslow's paper on the lead- and zinc-deposits of Missouri (see p. 634)F. L. Clerc, Chicago, Ill. (communication to the Secretary): On page 681 in Mr. Winslow's paper, he refers to me as having "advocated the view that the ores were derived from the patches of Coal-
Jan 1, 1895
-
-
Chicago Discussions - Discussion of paper of Mr. Rickard (See p . 289)RichaRd PeaRce, Argo, Colo.: This contribution upon the very interesting subject of the origin of the gold of certain lode-formations offers many subjects for thonghtful consideration. The explanation
Jan 1, 1894
-
List of MeetingsJan 1, 1894