Search Documents

[ ]

Jan 1, 1938

Jan 1, 1927

Jan 1, 1932

Jan 1, 1910

There is plenty of sulphur available but not at the price currently being paid for brimstone. Immediate shortages may be felt before the market adjusts, making marginal sources and by-product sulphur and acid available. (See P. 403) Government aid for mineral exploration is available and regulations governing applications are available from The Defense Minerals Administration, Dept. of Interior. lust ask for M0-5 and also for the contract form which is MP-103.

Jan 5, 1951

Jan 1, 1967

By Marsh S. Watson, Robert A. Howard

An electrolytic model study has been made of the relative productivity of perforated casing. The results show that the relative productivity is roughly one-half to two-thirds of that predicted from point-sink calculations. This discrepancy can he satisfactorily explained on the basis of casing interference. The relative productivity was found to he insensitive to spatial arrangement of the perforations. INTRODUCTION The relative productivity of wells with perforated casing has been treated mathematically by Muskat.' In his treatment the perforations are represented by small spheres, thus enabling him to approximate the flow by that to point sinks. By neglecting interference between the flow into the various spheres representing the perforations, one may deduce the approximate formula Qu 1/rp - 1/rw • (1) I + b/2n _________ 2n In re/rw Where Q is the flow rate into spherical sinks located in the median plane of the sand laver Qo is the open hole flow rate (uncased hole of radius rw) b is the thickness of sand layer under consideration (always one foot in this paper) n is the number of spherical sinks in the sand layer rp is the radius of a spherical sink rw is the well radius re is the drainage radius of the well. Fig. 1 is a comparison of values calculated from equation (1) with Mus-kat's values. It will be observed that the approximate values are in error by less than 21/2 per cent. The disturbing effect of the casing on the flow line; is not explicitly taken into account by Muskat, but he reasons that interference between the flow pat- terns from the various point sinks will result in a negligible flow in the region within the well radius, and that no appreciable error will result from not explicitly excluding flow from this region. This line of reasoning is open to question, however, as the flow impedance, in the immediate vicinity of the well, of a hemispherical cavity in contact with an opening in the casing is twice that of a spherical sink in a continuous sand layer. There will be a difference, moveover, between the flow into a hemispherical cavity and that into a circular hole in the casing. .This latter difference can best be appreciated by comparing the flow from a semi-infinite medium into a hemispherical cavity at the edge of the medium with the flow out of a circular opening of the same radius as the hemisphere and which is also on the edge of the medium. In this case2 ------= —2, showing that the difference in flow rates into differently shaped cavities is quite appreciable. It was the purpose of the investigation reported here to determine to what extent flow into circular perforations in casing departs from the values calculated by Muskat. For this purpose an electrolytic model was used.

Jan 1, 1950

The necessary funds have been provided for the award in 1915 of three prizes, respectively of $50, $30, and $20, for the best essays, or other papers, submitted in competition by Junior Members and Members of Affiliated Student Societies. The following rules for the competition are therefore established in accordance with the instructions of the Board of Directors May 22, 1914: (1) A competitor for the President's Prizes must be, at the time of submitting his essay, either a Junior Member or a Member of an Affiliated Student Society of this Institute.

Jan 1, 1917

Jan 1, 1929

Jan 1, 1905

Jan 1, 1933

Jan 1, 1951

Jan 1, 1908

The following list contains the names of members of whose deaths notices have been printed in MINING AND METALLURGY during the year ending April 1, 1939. Biographical sketches published in MINING AND METALLURGY are indicated in the last two columns.

Jan 1, 1944

Jan 1, 1951

Jan 1, 1946

By A. J. Zinkl

A two-year test led to adoption of carbide insert bits at the Iron King mine. Results: greater production, lower costs, and happier miners.

Jan 4, 1951

[ASSETS CAPITAL ASSETS: Equity in United Engineering Society's Land and Buildings $486,792.79 Library 40,000.00 $526,792.79 INVESTMENTS: Jas. Douglas Fund-Schedule #2 $ 99,966.40 Life Membership Fund-Schedule #3 9,415.63 R. W. Hunt Medal Fund-Schedule #4 7,489.09 116,871.12 INVENTORIES: Paper Account 305.10] [ ]

Jan 1, 1925

MINING METHODS W. J. COULTER, Chairman P. B. BUCKY, Vice-Chairman CLYDE E. WEED, Vice-Chairman ROBERT S. PALMER, Secretary Alluvial Mining CLINTON BERNARD O. B. FERRY NORMAN CLEAVELAND C. M. ROMANOWITZ R. B. EARLING J. B. STAPLER BENERE H. GRANTCHARLES THURMAN

Jan 1, 1944