Search Documents

By Lillian Erskine

WHILE brass and other copper alloys have long been listed as offering health hazards to their workers, it is questionable if the metals involved are alone responsible for the trades' records of morbidity. The entire science of foundry sanitation is the product of the past two decades; and the best standards now operative would have been regarded as little short of revolutionary prior to 1910. The special handicap to the conservation of the health of the brass founder's employees has been the fact that, unlike the iron founder, his business could be profitably carried on in almost any small and unsanitary quarters. As a result, writers on occupational disease have accepted brass chills or brass founders' ague as an inevitable feature of the trade; and respiratory disabilities, as well as phthisis and disturbances of the nervous system, are also included as prevalent among those employed. While there can be no question as to the basic accuracy of past investigations, there is every reason to doubt the necessity for an undue percentage of ill health among brass molders and casters who are safeguarded by scientific ventilating standards and by improving personal habits of sobriety. There is, however, need for a campaign of education as to the most approved practices and equipment whereby the employer may safeguard the health of his workers, and thereby reduce his labor turnover and increase his productive efficiency. Broadly speaking, copper, tin, and aluminum carry negligible health hazards. The toxic qualities of lead, however, are a menace; especially if scrap lead is recovered or bought for foundry processes. The rapid volatilization of zinc renders its fumes and flocculent condensation the chief problems in conserving the health of the brass worker. The frequent presence in the foundry air of traces of arsenic compounds, lead

Jan 2, 1919

JESSE L. JONES,* Pittsburgh, Pa.-I would like to ask Miss Erskine if down-draft has been used in any of the foundries where heavy fumes have to be removed, instead of the overhead draft.? L. -ERSKINE.-The system of overhead draft to remove heavy fumes has been very much more successful. The entire efforts of the New Jersey Department of Labor in regard to stabilizing conditions in the foundry are the result of the physical examination of the foundryman himself on first-hand information as to the prevalence of the minor ailments and the bad timekeeping that naturally accompanies them. These ailments are a factor in not only increasing the labor turnover but in increasing the percentage of bad work as well. The physical exertion of the foundryman himself is of course an important factor. In certain standard shops the amount of energy expended runs from 11 to 13 tons of foot-pounds of energy a day. In certain shops on piece work, I found a record of the energy expended per day to run as high as 22 tons. In one shop, during the war period, the management established a bonus system, and the men increased their output from 60 to 100 molds a day. The result was an increase of some 60 per cent. in output, and an increase of 400 per cent. in defective castings. The question of the physical exertion in the unsanitary foundries, of course, is very much complicated by other factors, for which reason the department has devoted a good deal of attention to estimating what is a reasonable exertion in a sanitary, well ventilated foundry. We have met certain physical difficulties in the brass foundries that the iron foundries did not have. All that information is available through our Bureau of Industrial Information. The question of the physical energy exerted by the molder is found to have a very distinct bearing on the question of contracts, for the possibility of increasing production is balanced by the extra overhead involved. JESSE L. JONES.-I would like to ask if any evidence has been noticed of carbon-monoxid poisoning among the employees of the foundries.

Jan 4, 1919

By C. G. Dunn

IDENTIFICATION Of the kinds of orientation relationships that may exist among crystals is an important problem in the metallurgical field. As an aid to its solution standard orientations of several orders of twins would be very useful for rapid analyses to discover high-order as well as low-order twin relationships. Although data have been published that give orientations for three generations of twins, these data are not readily useful in the form presented; i.e., in a stereographic projection with one pole per orientation.1 However, accurate data based on calculations of the positions of all {100} planes for such groups would be very useful when presented in tabular form. Therefore, calculations have been made for a group of four orders of twins and the data are listed in Table 3. Illustrative applications are considered briefly, with the idea of pointing out what may be done with large groups of orientations. METHOD OF COMPUTING ORIENTATION OF A TWIN It is common practice to describe the orientation of a crystal in terms of the positions on a stereographic net of the poles of certain planes of the crystal. A single position on a net may be given it terms of two angle variables, two sets of which appear in the following equations: [Polar NetWalff Net x=rsinOocos4pyx=rcos0. y=rsinB,sin4,ny-rsin0.cos¢,, z=rcos0,,z=rsin0.sin4,,] The three numbers x, y and z determine a length r as well as a direction [(0, 0)] in an X, Y, Z coordinate system. In the present case, r will be set equal to (h2 + k2 +12)1/3, where h, k and 1 are the usual Miller indices for a crystallographic plane, a restriction that facilitates determination of the positions of poles of new planes from those of old or known ones,2 as will become evident later. Furthermore, since twinned lattices have certain planes in common, it is an easy matter to determine the orientation of a twin of a crystal if the orientation of the crystal itself is known. We start therefore with a crystal of known orientation (positions of three {100} poles given) and determine where the cube poles occur in first, second, third and fourth-order twins. Methods for identifying twinned lattices and for making the calculations to find the orientation of a twin have been published.3 4 Reference 4 will be illustrated in the calculation of the orientation of a twin, even though this method differs from the one used by the writer in obtaining the following data on four orders of twins. Consider a crystal S and its twin A1, A1 being one of the four {112} or {III}

Jan 1, 1945

By Rundqvist

The best method to minimise disturbances from traffic to the neighbourhood and in Urban is probably to go underground. For obvious reasons this will cause vibrations, noise and other environmental effects which need very strict regulations and quality assurance in order to complete the work successfully. One project is “Southern Link”, a part of a ring road system. The system of tunnels includes 16 kilometres of tunnels right beneath the south part of the city of Stockholm. At least 20.000 people will be or could be affected by different kinds of disturbances and pollution such as vibrations, noise, gas and groundwater. Another project is the “Arlanda Link”. A new railway with three stations has been built under the existing and running to Arlanda airport with its terminals. Authorities have carefully judged these projects, which cause complaints from neighbours due to disturbances. The blasting operations are professionally managed by the contractors and controlled by consultants to keep the regulations according to the Swedish standards, which are well described in the tender documents by risk analysis and technical descriptions. In spite of that, one conclusion is that it is not always possible to go underground without exceeding stipulated regulations with existing technique. Some of the regulations also double the cost of excavation

Jan 1, 2001

Jan 1, 1929

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS EUGENE McAULIFFE, Chairman. L. E. YOUNG, Vice-chairman. CHESTER A. FULTON WIILBER JUDSOIN PAUL D. AMERICA FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ERLE V. DAVELER, Chairman. HENRY KRUMB H. Y. WALKER ADMISSIONS FELIX E. WORMISER, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON. Vice-Chairman CARROLL A. GARNER PHILIP KRAFT E. M. WISE

Jan 1, 1942

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS C. H. MATHEWSON. Chairman PAUL D. MERICA, Vice-Chairman CHESTER A. FULTON CARROLL A. GARNER H. Y. WALKER FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ERLE Y. DAVELER, Chairman WILBER JUDSON RUSSELL B. PAUL HENRY KRUMB, Consultant

Jan 1, 1943

Executive JOHN R. SUMAN, Chairman PAUL D. MERICA, Vice-Chairman CHESTER A. FULTON W. M. PEIRCE H. Y. WALKER Finance H. T. HAMIL'T'ON, Chairman ERLE V. DAVELER HENRY KRUMB Admissions FELIX E. WORMSER, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON, Vice-Chairman PHILIP KRAFT EDWARD MEAGHER CLYDE E. WILLIAMS

Jan 1, 1941

Executive JOHN M. LOVEJOY, Chairman ERLE V. DAVELER G. B. WATERHOUSE WISER JUDSON WILLIAM WRAITH J. V. W. REYNDERS, Consultant Finance HENRY KRUM, Chairman PAUL D. MERICA R. M. ROOSEVELT H. G. MOULTON, Consultant Admissions. RALPH M. ROOSEVELT, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON, Vice-chairman JOHN L. CHRISTI PHILIP KRAFT W. A. SINSHEIMER

Jan 1, 1936

Executive HENRY A. BUEHLER, Chairman ERLE V. DAVELER EDGAR RICKARD JOHN M. LOVEJOY WILLIAM WRAITH J. V. W. REYNDERS, Consultant Finance HENRY KRUMB, Chairman E. E. ELLIS PAUL D. MERICA H. G. MOULTON, Consultant Admissions RALPH M. ROOSEVELT, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON DONALD M. LIDDELL WILBER JUDSONW. D. B. MOTTER, JR.

Jan 1, 1934

Executive HOWARD N. EAVENSON, Chairman FREDERICK M. BECKET EDGAR RICKARD ERLE V. DAVELER WILLIAM WRAITH Finance HENRY KRUMB, Chairman PAUL I). MERICA J. V. W. REYNDERS H. G. MOULTON, Consultant Admissions JOHN M. LOVEJOY, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON DONALD M. LIDDELL ELI T. CONNER WILLIAM W. LYNCH Alternates WM. H. BASSETT, JR. L. B. LINDEMUTH W. A. SINSHEIMER

Jan 1, 1934

Executive R. C. ALLEN, Chairman ERLE V. DAVELER, Vice-chairman WILDER JUDSON R. M. ROOSEVELT G. B. WATERHOUSE Finance H. G. MOULTON, Chairman HENRY KRUMB PAUL D. MERICA H. T. HAMILTON, Consultant Admissions W. B. HEROY, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON, Vice-chairman H. T. HAMILTON PHILIP KRAFT W. A. SINSHEIMER

Jan 1, 1937

Executive FREDERICK M. BECKET, Chairman HOWARD N. EAVENSON J. V. W. REYNDERS H. A. GUESS WILLIAM WRAITH Finance HENRY KRUMB, Chairman PAUL H. MERCER H. G. MOULTON Admissions JOHN M. LOVEJOY, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON DONALD M. LIDDELI. E. V. DAVELER W. D. B. MOTTER, JR. Alternates AMOR F. KEENE L. F. STROBEL SAM TOUR Membership LEWIS B. LINDEMUTH, Chairman EDWARD H. ROBIE, Secretary Executive Committee NELSON DICKERMAN FREDERICK LAIST FRED H. KAY THOMAS T. READ H. A. KURSELL A. T. SHURICK SAM TOUR

Jan 1, 1932

Executive JOHN M LOVEJOY, Chairman ERLE V DAVELER G B WATERHOUBE WILBER JUDSON WILLIAM WRAITH J V W REYNDERS, Consultant Finance HENRY KRUMB, Chairman PAUL D MERICA R M ROOSEVELT H G MOULTON, Consultant Admissions RALPH M ROOSEVELT, Chairman GEORGE D BARRON, Vice-chairman JOHN L CHRISTIE PHILIP KRAFT W A SINSHEIMER

Jan 1, 1937

Executive HOWARD N EAVENSON, Chairman FREDERICK M. BECKET EDGAR RICKARD ERLE V. DAVELER WILLIAM WRAITH Finance HENRY KRUMB Chairman PAUL D. MERICA J V W REYNDERS H G MOULTON, Consultant Admissions JOHN M LOVEJOY, Chairman GEORGE D BARRON - DONALD M LIDDELL ELI T CONNER - WILLIAM W LYNCH

Jan 1, 1935

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHESTER A. FULTON, Chairman CARROLL A. GARNER H. Y. WALKER WALLACE E. PRATT FELIX E: WORMSER PAUL D. MERICA, Consultant FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ERIE V. DAVELER, Chairman WILBER JUDSON RUSSELL B. PAUL HENRY KRUMB, Consultant

Jan 1, 1944

[Executive J. V. W. REYNDERS, Chairman WILLIAM H. BASSETT E. DEGOLYER I-I. C. BELLINGER RICHARD PETERS, JR. Finance GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Chairman H. A. GUESS F. JULIUS FOHS Admissions GEORGE D. BARRON, Chairman DAVID LEVINGER P. A. MOSMAN H. K. MASTERS J. A, SINGMASTER Alternates F. G. BREYER C. W. HAMILTON F. E. PIERCE]

Jan 1, 1928

Executive DONALD B. GILLIES, Chairman WILLIAM WRAITH, Vice-Chairman ERLE V. DAVELER PAUL D. MERICA W. H. PEIRCE Finance H. G. MOULTON, Chairman H. T. HAMILTON HENRY KRUMB Admissions CHESTER A. FULTON, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON, Vice-Chairman A. B. JESSUP PHILIP KRAFT EDWARD MEAGHER Alternates P.B. BUCKY SAMUEL HASKELL F. T. SISCO

Jan 1, 1939

[Executive HENRY A. BUEHLER, Chairman ERLE V. DAVELER EDGAR RICHARD JOHN M. LOVEJOY WILLIAM WRAITH J. V. W. REYNDERS, Consultant Finance HENRY KRUMB, Chairman E. E. ELLIS PAUL D. MERICA H. G. MOULTON, Consultant]

Jan 1, 1936

[Executive HERBERT G. MOULTON, Chairman WILLIAM WRAITH, Vice-Chairman ,PAUL D. MERICA W. M. PEIRCE H. Y. WALKER Finance H. T. HAMILTON, Chairman ERLE V. DAVELER HENRY KRUMB Admissions FELIX E. WORMSER, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON, Vice-Chairman CHESTER A. FULTON PHILIP KRAFT EDWARD MEAGHER Alternates P. B. BUCKY LLOYD C. GIBSON F. T. SISCO]

Jan 1, 1940