Search Documents
Search Again
Search Again
Refine Search
Refine Search
- Relevance
- Most Recent
- Alphabetically
Sort by
- Relevance
- Most Recent
- Alphabetically
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Keyes's Paper on Genesis of the Lake Valley, New Mexico, Silver-Dc- posits (see Trans., xxxix., 139)William M. Courtis, Detroit, Mich. (communication to the Secretary*):—I have a few items to add to the history of the Lake Valley mines. In December, 1879, I was sent to the Bassic mine of Colorado
Jan 1, 1910
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Keyes's Paper on Ozark Lead- and Zinc-Deposits: Their Genesis, Localization, and Migration (see p. 184)E. R. Buckley, Flat River, Mo. (communication to the Secretary*) :—Some statements in the paper of Mr. Keyes relative to the nature and formation of the Ozark lead- and zinc-deposits seen1 to me erron
Jan 1, 1910
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Lee's Paper on The Gas-Producer as an Auxiliary in Iron Blast-Furnace Practice (see p. 366)J. T. Pullon, Rowangarth, Roundhay, Leeds, England :— In discussing Mr. Lee's paper, I wish to call attention to the fact that Mr. B. II. Thwaite (who was heard here yesterday on the subject of t
Jan 1, 1907
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Lindgren's Paper on the Geological Features of the Gold Production of North America. (see p. 790)Willet G. Miller, Toronto, Canada (communication to the Secretary): In his interesting paper Mr. Lindgren says: " As to ultimate results, it would seem as if we should be justified in concluding, with
Jan 1, 1903
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Lodge's Paper on the Assay of Zinc-Box Residues from the Cyanide Process (see p. 432)Charles H. Fulton, Rapid City, So. Dak. (communication to the Secretary*): Professor Lodge takes issue with Mr. Crawford and myself on results obtained by the scorification-method of assay on " zinc-b
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Parker's Paper on The Conservation of Coal in the United States (sec p. 596)W. L. Saunders, New York, N. Y.:—Mr. Parker's paper, though entitled Conservation of Coal, might also be called the Conservation of Life in the Coal-Mines of the United States. No subject is of g
Jan 1, 1910
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Prichard's Paper on Observations on Mother Lode Gold-Deposits, California (see p. 454)H. W. Turner, San Francisco, Cal. (communication to the Secretary*): This excellent paper apparently represents the results of extensive observation and experience among the mines of the Mother-Lode,
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Probert's Paper on the Operation of the " Hole-Contract " System in the Center Star and War Eagle Mines (see p. 628)Frank H. Probert, A.R.S.M., Morenci, Arizona (communication to the Secretary): The management of mines and the system of bookkeeping employed are subjects of great interest to mine-superintendents, an
Jan 1, 1902
-
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Roe's Paper on The Manufacture and Characteristics of Wrought-Iron (see p. 203)C. Edward Stafford, Chester, Pa.:—Doring all my business life, I have been engaged in the manufacture of Bessemer and open-hearth steels, but, during my long connection with the Shoenberger Steel Co.
Jan 1, 1906
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Rutledge's Paper on The Clinton Iron-Ore Deposits in Stone Valley, Huntingdon County, Pa. (see p. 134)William Kelly, Vulcan, Mich.:—In the northern part of Bedford county, Pa., the county immediately south of Huntingdon, the Clinton measures appear along the eastern slope of Tussey mountain near its b
Jan 1, 1910
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Scholz's Paper on Effect of Humidity in Mine-Explosions (see Trans., xxxix., 328)Howard N. Eavenson, Gary, W. Va. (communication to the Secretary*):—For some time before the publication of Mr. Scholz's paper, I had been collecting data bearing upon its subject, and I now take
Jan 1, 1910
-
-
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Smith's Paper on the Garnet-Formations of the Chillagoe Copper-Field, North Queensland, Australia (see p. 467)K. W. Turner, Sail Francisco, Cal. (communication to the Secretary*): The recent papers in the Transactions by Vogt,' Lindgren2 and Weed: on ore-deposits that have formed as a direct result of ig
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Spurr's Paper on A Consideration of Igneous Rocks and their Segregation or Differentiation its Related to the Occurrence of Ores (see p. 288)Alexander N. Winchell, Butte, Mont. (communication to the Secretary): Mr. Spurr calls attention to the fact that an ore-deposit may be due to a succession of concentrations at different geological epo
Jan 1, 1903
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Stow's paper on Pressure-Fans vs. Exhaust-Fans (see p. 398)R. V. Norris, Wilkes-Barre, Pa. (communication to the Secretary*):—Mr. Stow's paper presents a series of arguments, numbered from 1 to 18, concerning the relative merits of four systems of collie
Jan 1, 1910
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Tay's Paper on the Bryan Mill as a Crusher and Amalgamator Compared with the Stamp Battery (see vol. xxix., pp. 776,1054)Mr. Tays (communication to the Secretary): Mr. Wynne's criticism of my paper* brings forward a few points which are really important, and might properly have been considered in the original paper
Jan 1, 1902
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Van Liew's Paper on the Relative Elimination of Impurities in Bessemerizing Copper-Matte (see p. 418)Allan Gibb, Mount Perry, Queensland, Australia (communication to the Secretary):—In drawing conclusions from his observations, Mr. Van Liew has apparently overlooked the reduction in weight that takes
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Watson's Paper on Geological Relations of the Manganese-Ore Deposits of Georgia (see p. 207)Charles Catlett, Staunton, Virginia (communication to the Secretary*): I have had occasion to examine a few of the irondeposits in the immediate section of which Mr. Watson speaks, but have not had an
Jan 1, 1904