Search Documents

COUNCIL AND STANDING COMMITTEES, 1974-1975 Office Bearers : Prof. R. P. Plewman (President), Dr R. E. Robinson and Dr M. D. G. Salamon (Vice Presidents), J. K. E. Douglas (Honorary Treasurer), and P. W. J. van Rensburg (Immediate Past President). Elected Members of Council: Dr M. G. Atmore, E. Collier, G. H. Grange, Dr P. R. Jochens, Dr D. I. Legge, D. G. Malan, C. T. Shaw, L. W. P. van den Bosch, D. A. Viljoen, H. M. Wells, P. A. von Wielligh. Branch Chairmen: B. T. Hosking (Witbank-Middelburg Branch), D. A. Smith (Orange Free State Branch). Past Presidents Serving on Council: R. J. Adamson, M. Barcza (until May 1975), H. Britten, H. E. Cross, Prof. J. de V. Lambrechts (until December 1974), R. C. J. Goode, Prof. D. D. Howat, Dr J. P. Hugo, D. M. Jamieson, D. G. Maxwell, Dr J. T. McIntyre, V. C. Robinson. Ten Council meetings were held during the year, with an average attendance of 19, and the standing and sub-committees held 74 meetings. COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN Membership, Dr M. D. G. Salamon; Technical Programme-Metallurgy, D. A. Viljoen; Technical Programme-Mining, G. H. Grange ; Vacation School-Metallurgy, Dr P. R. Jochens; Vacation School-Mining, Dr M. D. G. Salamon; Awards, Prof. R. P. Plewman; Excursions, Dr D. I. Legge; Constitution, Rules and Policy, P. W. J. van Rensburg and Prof. R. P. Plewman; Mines and Works, P. A. von Wielligh; Education, P. W. J. van Rensburg. REPRESENTATIVES ON OTHER BODIES Associated Scientific and Technical Societies Members: V. C. Robinson and Prof. R. P. Plewman. Alternates : Dr R. E. Robinson and Dr M. D. G. Salamon. Federation of Societies of Professional Engineers Members : J. K. E. Douglas and P. W. J. van Rensburg. Alternates : Prof. R. P. Plewman and G. H. Grange. South African Council for Professional Engineers Member : R. C. J. Goode. Alternate : G. H. Grange. Engineers' Liaison Committee (Pretoria) Member: Dr J. P. Hugo. Alternate: P. W. J. van Rensburg. MEMBERSHIP Thirteen Fellows, seventeen Members, eleven Graduates, three Associate Members, eighteen Associ¬ates, twenty-six Students, and one Company Affiliate were elected during the year. Nine Fellows, four Members, and three Associates were admitted to retired membership. Eight Fellows were elected to Honorary Life Membership. Three Members and one Graduate were transferred to Fellows, nine Graduates and two Students to Members, six Students to Graduates, one Student to Associate, and one Associate to Associate Member. Six Fellows, ten Members, three Associates, and one Student resigned. A statement of membership as at June 30th 1975 and the end of the previous year is shown in the following tabulation: 30th - 30th June, - June, 1974 - 1975 Honorary Life Fellows - 9 - 15 Honorary Fellows 8 - 8 Life Fellows 170 - 170 Fellows 544 - 536 Members 512 - 523 Associate Members 10 -15 Graduates 130 - 133 Associates 194 - 210 Students 173 -175 Company Affiliates 70 - 71 1 820 - 1 851 [ ] OBITUARIES Your Council records with deep regret the death during the year of the following members: M. Barcza, Honorary Life Fellow and Past President of the Institute; J. A. Boyd, F. E. Keep and J. H. Taylor, Life Fellows; I. D. B. Corner, C. O'G. Deane, R. E. Gilmour, A. C. Hofmeyr, M. W. Howell, T. J. Robin and F. C. Steinhobel, Fellows; J. J. Frankel, Member; T. J. Higgs, Associate. FINANCE The annual accounts, which follow this report, indicate that income again exceeded expenditure by a margin of R21 410 (last year R28 524). This year's income of R71 184 showed a further increase compared with last year's figure of R55 025. Costs, however, also in¬creased, and it is calculated that, excluding non-recurrent costs, the cost of running the Institute in¬creased by R6 654 from R25 501 to R33 155 for the current year. The main increases were involved in secretarial fees, stationery and print¬ing, and in publication of the Journal. All indications are that costs will continue to rise, and we have been advised that the A.S. & T.S. will be increasing their secretarial fees by 25 per cent in the year ahead to meet their rising costs. This year's surplus was derived entirely from the revenue from sales of publications (R13 644) and a surplus from the 1974 Winter School (RIO 654). There can be no certainty that revenue from these sources can be repeated each year. Our funds are in a satisfactory position because of these worth¬while activities, but the administrat¬ion of the Institute should not de¬pend on them. Council will accord¬ingly have to give consideration in the year ahead to an upward adjust¬ment of subscriptions to meet rising costs.

Jan 10, 1975

Council and Standing Committees, 1977-1978 President: P. A. von Wielligh. Vice-Presidents: Dr M. G. Atmore and D. A. Viljoen. Honorary Treasurer: J. K. E. Douglas. Immediate Past President, Dr M. D. G. Salamon. Members of Council: J. D. Austin, A. N. Brown, A. A. Hazell, Dr P. R. Jochens, Prof. R. P. King, Dr D. G. Krige, Prof. F. Q. P. Leiding, D. G. Malan, J. C. Mostert, H. G. M. Rose, W. T. Ruhmer, A. A. Sealey, R. A. von Maltitz. Chairman, Witbank-Middelburg Branch: T. S. Wilmot. Chairman, Orange Free State-Klerksdorp Branch: A. N. Shand. Past Presidents Serving on Council: R. J. Adamson, H. Britten, J. K. E. Douglas, Prof. D. D. Howat, Dr J. P. Hugo, D. G. Maxwell, Prof. R. P. Plowman, Dr R. E. Robinson, P. W. J. van Rensburg. Standing Committee Chairmen: Membership, D. A. Vil¬joen; Technical Programme - Metallurgy, Dr P. R. Jochens ; Technical Programme - Mining, Dr D. K. Krige ; Vacation School - Metallurgy, Prof. R. P. King ; Vacation School - Mining, Dr M. D. G. Salamon; Awards, Dr M. D. G. Salamon; Excursions, Dr M. G. Atmore; Adjudication, Dr M. D. G. Salamon; Consti¬tution, Rules, and Policy, Dr M. D. G. Salamon; Mines and Works, P. A. von Wielligh ; Education, Dr M. D. G. Salamon; Monograph Series, Dr R. E. Robinson; Phoenix National Committee, Dr R. E. Robinson ; Pyrometallurgical Discussion Group Convenor, Dr J. B. See/Dr D. I. Ossin.

Jan 1, 1979

Council and Standing Committees, 1978-1979 President: Dr M. G. Atmore. Vice-Presidents: D. A. Viljoen and Dr P. R. Jochens. Honorary Treasurer: J. K. E. Douglas. Immediate Past President: P. A. von Wielligh. Members of Council: J. D. Austin, A. N. Brown, H. E. James, Prof. R. P. King, Dr D. G. Krige, Prof. F. Q. P. Leiding, D. G. Malan, C. S. McPhail, J. C. Mostert, G. Y. Nisbet, H. G. M. Rose, W. T. Ruhmer, G. C. Thompson, R. A. von Maltitz. Chairman, Witbank-Middelburg Branch: T. S. Wilmot. Chairman, Orange Free State-Klerksdorp Branch: H. M. W. Eschenburg. Past Presidents Serving on Council: R. J. Adamson, H. Britten, J. K. E. Douglas, Prof. D. D. Howat, Dr J. P. Hugo, D. G. Maxwell, Prof. R. P. Plewman, Dr R. E. Robinson, Dr M. D. G. Salamon, P. W. J. van Rensburg. Standing Committee Chairmen: Membership, Dr P. R. Jochens ; Technical Programme - Metallurgy, Prof. R. P. King ; Technical Programme - Mining, H. G. M. Rose; Vacation School - Metallurgy, J. C. Mostert; Vacation School - Mining, D. G. Malan/J. D. Austin; Awards, P. A. von Wielligh; Excursions, D. A. Viljoen; Adjudication, P. A. von Wielligh; Constitution, Rules and Policy, P. A. von Wielligh; Monograph Series, Dr R. E. Robinson; Professional and Technician Train¬ing Committee, Dr M. D. G. Salamon; Career Guidance, D. G. Malan; Phoenix National Committee, Dr R. E. Robinson; 1982 World Congress, Dr M. G. Atmore; Witbank Coal Colloquium, Dr P. R. Jochens; Mines and Works, P. A. von Wielligh.

Jan 1, 1979

Council and Standing Committees, 1979-1980 President: D. A. Viljoen. Senior Vice-President: Dr P. R. Jochens. Junior Vice-President: G. Y. Nisbet. Honorary Treasurer: Dr D. G. Krige. Immediate Past President: Dr M. G. Atmore. Members of Council: J. D. Austin, A. N. Brown, J. A. Cruise, C. E. Fivaz, J. S. Freer, P. N. Harris, H. E. James, Dr R. P. King, Prof. F. Q. P. Leiding, Dr B. K. Love¬day, D. G. Malan, C. S. Macphail, J. C. Mostert, H. G. M. Rose, G. C. Thompson, R. A. von Maltitz, Dr H. Wagner. Past Presidents Serving on Council: R. J. Adamson, H. Britten, J. K. E. Douglas, Prof. D. D. Howat, Dr J. P. Hugo, D. G. Maxwell, Prof. R. P. Plowman, Dr R. E. Robinson, Dr M. D. G. Salamon, P. W. J. van Rensburg, P. A. von Wielligh. Chairman, Witbank-Middelburg Branch: R. B. Smith. Chairman, Orange Free State-Klerksdorp Branch: W. C. Mather. Materials Engineering Division, Chairman: Dr J. P. Hugo. Secretary: G. Pienaar. Standing Committee Chairmen: Membership, G. Y. Nisbet; Technical Programme Metallurgy, H. E. James, (Prof. R. P. King) ; Technical Programme Mining, H. G. M. Rose; Vacation School Metallurgy, J. C. Mos¬tert; Vacation School Mining, J. D. Austin; Awards, Dr M. G. Atmore ; Excursions, A. N. Brown ; Adjudications, Dr M. G. Atmore ; Constitution, Rules, and Policy, Dr M. G. Atmore ; Monograph Series, Dr M. G. Atmore ; Training and Career Guidance, P. A. von Wielligh (D. G. Malan) ; National Phoenix Committee, Dr R. E. Robin¬son; 1982 Council of Mining and Metallurgical Congress, Dr M. G. Atmore ; Mines and Works, Dr M. G. Atmore.

Jan 1, 1980

Council and Standing Committees - 1981/82 President: G. Y. Nisbet. Senior Vice-President: Prof. A. N. Brown. Junior Vice-President: Prof. R. P. King. Honorary Treasurer: Prof. D. G. Krige. Immediate Past President: Dr P. R. Joehens. Members of Council: B. C. Alberts, J. D. Austin, P. T. Fewell, C. E. Fivaz, J. J. Geldenhuys, Dr A. K. Haines, P. N. Harris, H. E. James, C. G. Knobbs, Dr B. K. Love¬day, Dr J. Lurie, C. S. MacPhail, D. G. Malan, J. C. Mostert, G. C. Thompson, Dr H. Wagner. Chairman, Witbank/Middelburg Branch: B. Rohrmann. Chairman, Orange Free State/Klerksdorp Branch: K. F. W. Eick. Chairman, Materials Engineering Specialist Division: G. Pienaar. Past Presidents serving on Council: Dr M. G. Atmore, H. Britten, Prof. D. D. Howat, Dr J. P. Hugo, D. G. Maxwell, Prof. R. P. Plewman, Dr R. E. Robinson, Prof. M. D. G. Salamon, P. W. J. van Rensburg, D. A. Viljoen, P. A. von Wielligh. Standing Committee Chairmen: Constitution, Rules and Policy, Dr P. R. Jochens; Membership, Prof. R. P. King; Training, Career Guidance and Education, P. A. von Wielligh; Journal, Prof. A. N. Brown; Monograph Series, D. G. Malan; Technical Programme - Metallurgy, C. E. Fivaz; Technical Programme - Mining, P. N. Harris; SAIMM Schools - Metallurgy, Dr B. K. Loveday; SAIMM Schools - Mining, J. D. Austin; 1982 CMMI Congress, Dr M. G. Atmore; Awards, Dr P. R. Jochens; Adjudication, Dr P. R. Joehens; Phoenix National Committee, Dr M. G. Atmore; Excursions, J. C. Mostert; Mines and Works, Prof. A. N. Brown; World Mining Congress - National Committee, Prof. R. P. Plewman.

Jan 1, 1982

Council and Standing Committees-1984/85 President: J.D. Austin Vice Presidents: H.E. James and Dr H. Wagner Immediate Past President: Prof. R.P. King Honorary Treasurer: Prof. D.G. Krige Members of Council: B.C. Alberts, Prof. S. Budavari, E.B. Crocker, N.J. Devine, C.E. Fivaz, J.S. Freer, Prof. G.G. Garrett, J.J. Geldenhuys, Dr A.K. Haines, R.W.O. Kersten, Dr B.K. Loveday, I.D. Matthews, G. Maude, H.G. Mosenthal, B.E. Protheroe, Dr O.K.H. Steffen, Dr P.T. Wedepohl Chairman, Witbank/Middelburg Branch: W.C. Mather Chairman, Orange Free State/Klerksdorp Branch: Dr M.A. Orridge Past Presidents Serving on Council: Dr M.G. Atmore, Prof. A.N. Brown, Dr P.R. Jochens, G.Y. Nisbet, Prof. R.P. Plewman, Dr R.E. Robinson, Prof. M.D.G. Salamon, P.W.J. van Rensburg, D.A. Viljoen, P.A. von Wielligh Standing Committee Chairmen: Adjudication, Prof. R.P. King; Awards, Prof. R.P. King; Constitution, Rules and Policy, Prof. R.P. King; Excursions and Banquet, B.E. Protheroe; Journal, H.E. James; Membership, Dr H. Wagner; Phoenix National Committee, Dr M.G. Atmore; SAIMM School-Extractive Metallurgy, J.S. Freer; SAIMM School-Mining, Prof. S. Budavari; Special Publications, J.D. Austin; Technical Programme¬Extractive Metallurgy, Dr B.K. Loveday; Technical Programme-Mining, J.J. Geldenhuys; Technical Programme-Physical Metallurgy, Dr P.T. Wedepohl; Training, Career Guidance and Education, Prof. R.P. King; World Mining Congress-National Committee, Prof. R.P. Plewman; Working Group Physical Metallurgy, Prof. G. G. Garrett

Jan 1, 1985

Council and Standing Committees, 1976-1977 President: Dr M. D. G. Salamon. Vice-Presidents: P. A. von Wielligh and Dr M. G. Atmore. Honorary Treasurer: J. K. E. Douglas. Immediate Past President: Dr R. E. Robinson. Members of Council: J. D. Austin, E. Collier, C. T. Fenton, J. A. Holmes, Dr P. R. Jochens, Prof. R. P. King, Dr D. G. Krige, Prof. F. Q. P. Leiding, D. G. Malan, C. T. Shaw, D. A. Viljoen, R. A. von Maltitz. Chairman, Witbank-Middelburg Branch: E. J. Jackson. Chairman, Orange Free StatelKlerksdorp Branch: A. N. Shand. B. Past Presidents Serving on Council: R. J. Adamson, H. Britten, J. K. E. Douglas, R. C. J. Goode, Prof. D. D. Howat, Dr J. P. Hugo, D. G. Maxwell, Prof. R. P. Plewman, V. C. Robinson, P. W. J. van Rensburg. Ten Council meetings were held during the year, and the standing and sub-committees held seventy-one meetings. Standing Committee Chairmen: Membership, Dr M. G. Atmore; Technical Programme - Metallurgy, J. A. Holmes ; Technical Programme - Mining, C. T. Shaw; Vacation School - Metallurgy, Prof. R. P. King ; Vacation School - Mining, Dr D. G. Krige ; Awards, Dr R. E. Robinson; Excursions, C. T. Fenton; Adjudi¬cation, Dr R. E. Robinson; Constitution, Rules and Policy, Dr R. E. Robinson; Mines and Works, C. T. Shaw; Education, Dr R. E. Robinson; Pyrometallurgical Discussion Group (Convenor), Dr J. B. See; Phoenix National Committee, Dr R. E. Robinson.

Jan 1, 1978

ANNUAL meeting of the Woman's Auxiliary of the American Institute of Mining and Metal-lurgical Engineers convened on Tuesday morn-ing, Feb. 20, the president, Mrs. H. W. Hardinge, presiding. President Hardinge, in opening the meet-ing, said: "I have the honor and great pleasure to welcome you to our seventh annual meeting. It has been a happy year, though I started in fear and trembling. My fear is partly gone and my trembling becomes less as time goes on. Never has a chairman had such splendid cooperation and harmony in her work; no. matter how much was asked nor what the task, I have always received the same answer, `We are with you, of course we can do it.' Often the road has been untried and the way full of snares, but we have all pulled together. Is it any wonder we have had a prosperous year? I cannot thank the governing -board and officers enough for their help." Mrs. Hardinge described her trip through the West last summer, during which she visited many of the local sections of the Auxiliary. She also spoke of the work of the Rossiter Raymond memorial library which has been started as an activity of the Woman's Auxiliary. Mrs. Reynders read the minutes of the last annual meeting, and Mrs. Kemp read the treasurer's report. The latter showed that on Feb. 1, 1922, there was a bank balance of $683.61 and on Feb. 10, 1923, the bal-ance was $947.93. Mrs. Westervelt expressed the sorrow of the Auxiliary for the death -of Mrs. Florence Howe Hall and of Mrs. Levi P. Holbrook.

Jan 4, 1923

The US economy grew at a rate of 4% in 1994 and the gross domestic product rose to $6.74 trillion. With 261 million people - 605,000 in mining, including petroleum -the United States has l 10 million dwelling units and 200 million licensed motor vehicles. New private housing units authorized in 1994 rose 14% to 1.4 million units. New car production rose 11 % to 6.6 million units, while truck and bus production rose 30% to 5.2 million units. The inflation rate was less than 3% and the prime rate of interest averaged 7.15%. The producer price index (1982 = 100) for fuels and related products and power was down 4% to 78, while metals and metal products rose 5% to 125. Chemicals and allied products rose 3% to 132, and non-metallic mineral products rose 3% to 124. The merchandise trade deficit rose 25% to $166 billion. Disorder in the former Soviet Union led to substantial dumping of mineral materials. With vast mineral resources, the former Soviet Union land area totaled 22.4 million km2 (8.6 million sq miles). In comparison, the North Ameri¬can Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) area (United States, Canada and Mexico) totals 21.4 million km2 (8.3 million sq miles).

Jan 1, 1995

By D. R. Wilburn

his summary of international mineral exploration activities for the year 2011 draws upon available information from industry sources, published literature and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) specialists. The summary provides data on exploration budgets by region and mineral commodity, identifies significant mineral discoveries and areas of mineral exploration, discusses government programs affecting the mineral exploration industry and presents [ ] analyses of exploration activities performed by the mineral industry. Three sources of information are reported and analyzed in this annual review of international exploration: 1) budgetary statistics expressed in U.S. nominal dollars provided by Metals Economics Group (MEG) of Halifax, Nova Scotia; 2) regional and site-specific exploration activities that took place in 2011 as compiled by the USGS and 3) regional events including economic, social and political conditions that affected exploration activities, which were derived from published sources and unpublished discussions with USGS and industry specialists.

Jan 1, 2012

By N. A. Karl, D. R. Wilburn

"This summary of international mineral exploration activities for the year 2015 draws upon information from industry sources, published literature, SNL Metals & Mining (SNL) (Charlottesville, VA) database and specialists in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Minerals Information Center. The summary provides data on exploration budgets by region and mineral commodity, identifies significant mineral discoveries and areas of mineral exploration, discusses government programs affecting the mineral exploration industry, and presents analyses of exploration activities performed by the mineral industry.Three types of information are reported and analyzed in this annual review of international exploration: budgetary statistics expressed in U.S. dollars provided by SNL; regional and site-specific exploration activities that took place in 2015 as compiled by the USGS; and regional events that affected exploration activities including economic, social and political conditions, which were derived from published sources and discussions with USGS and industry specialists. Commodity and regional compilations are presented in this summary. Because multiple sources were used to develop commodity and regional compilations, statistics may vary depending on the source and type of data that are being reported.The SNL data summarize planned company budgets for worldwide exploration activities in 2015 for 24 nonfuel mineral commodities and metal alloys and are based on company surveys. Surveys focused on precious metals (gold, platinum-group metals and silver), base metals, (cobalt, copper, lead, molybdenum, nickel, tin and zinc), bulk commodities (bauxite, chromite, iron ore, manganese, phosphate and potash), and other commodities (diamond, graphite, heavy-mineral sands, lithium, niobium, rareearth elements (REE), tantalum, tungsten and uranium).USGS data compilations and analyses are based on information provided by USGS mineral commodity and country specialists, as well as industry contacts and published trade journals. The USGS data summarize exploration site data collected for more than 80 minerals and materials, with a focus on base metals, diamond and precious metals. The USGS analyzed available information to assess the level of exploration activity in 2015 and to report trends in mineral exploration activity for the period 2005 through 2015. These analyses identify where mineral exploration is occurring by commodity and region and the intensity of activity that is taking place in each region for selected mineral commodities, and determines those factors that most affect changes in exploration activity."

May 1, 2016

By R. L. Loofbourow

Trends in the metal mining industry were definitely down in 1954. With a record in 1953 of $1.8 billion output, the last year dropped to $1.5 billion, the lowest value since 1950. The decrease in iron ore production alone accounted for at least 10 pct of the decline. PROBABLY more than any previous year, political debates of 1954 marked a new high for the mining industry. Lead and zinc prices gave forth with minor rallies producing no real improvements. An anticipated drop in copper prices never came to be. Early in the year arguments for more free trade versus tariffs to restrict imports were voiced eloquently by Charles P. Taft, president, Committee for a National Trade Policy, and Andrew Fletcher, president, St. Joseph Lead Co.

Jan 3, 1955

By V. Vorontsov

Catalysts Mo-Ni-S were prepared by combining MoS2 and NiS in weight ratios 1:1, 1:2, 1:4 and 2:1, each of which was admixed with 5%wt Ag and 5%wt YSZ to increase three-phase boundary surface area of the electrode. For comparison catalysts comprising Co-Mo-S in weight ratio of 1:1 of CoS to MoS2 admixed with 5%wt Ag and YSZ and pre-sulfided NiMoO4 were made. The catalysts were examined for electrochemical oxidation of hydrogen sulfide in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) at 850°C temperature. The catalyst prepared from 1:1 (wt. %) NiS:MoS2 demonstrated highest performance. Current density up to 1,330 mA/cm2 and power density up to 300 mW/cm2 were achieved using pure H25 gas, which are the highest among the reported H2S-powered fuel cells ever published in the literature. Anode materials of different NiS:MoS2 ratios have been characterized by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), simultaneous TG/DSC analysis and Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA). TG/DSC and NAA results show that addition of NiS and Ag increases fuel cell performance due to improved structure/integrity of the anode. It has also been demonstrated that MoS2 is a suitable anode material in H2S-powered SOFC, with high activity towards H25 oxidation and thermally and chemically stable up to 850°C.

Jan 1, 2005

By Takeo Oki

A new suspension electrolysis method has been developed, which enables without any gas or dust pollutants a direct anodic extraction of zinc from zinc sulfide concentrates, while simultaneously oxidizing sulfide sulfur to elemental sulfur. The investigations were performed in a laboratory scale electrolytic cell with suspended zinc sulfide concentrate particles with or without graphite powder additions in dilute sulfuric acid electrolyte. By regulating the redox potential of the electrolysis system in combination with some additions, for example [Fe3+/Fe2+, MnO 4/MnO2, MnO 2/Mn2+ or MnO 4/Mn2+], the anodic dissolution reaction of zinc sulfide has been accomplished effectively without evolution of hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum conditions the anodic current efficiency of zinc dissolution ammounted up to 95 %, while sulfide sulfur was converted nearly completly to the elemental form. Purification by removal of sulfur and other impurities gives a zinc sulfate solution suitable for electrolysis to cathode zinc.

Jan 1, 1975

By M. S. Seehra, R. S. Pandurangi

"A comparative study of the intensities of the IR modes in the pjlotoacoustic and. FrIR spectroscopy of amorphous and crystalline SiO2 particles is presented. It is observed that in photoacoustic spectroscopy of amorphous SiO2, IR modes of surface species are enhanced by over an order of magnitude compared to the bulk IR modes of SiO2. This effect, though not yet understood, may find applications in surface science.Since the publication of the Rosencwaig-Gersho theory of the photoacoustic effect in solids in 1976 [1], a great deal of attention has been paid to the development .of photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS) into an analytical technique for condensed matter studies, especially when combined with the modern Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer [2-8]. PAS has now been applied to a variety of experimental situations [2, 3] and it is particularly suitable for opaque powders and for cases where ~ample preparation (e.g. mixing with KBr as is usually done in FTIR spectroscopy) is not desirable. Another area of interest is the depth profiling feature of PAS, which is studied by varying the modulation frequency of the incident radiation [2-8]. The one-dimensional Rosencwaig-Gersho theory for non-porous samples has been extended to other cases [9-12]. Recently it has become known [11, 12] that for porous samples with porosity the IR modes are enhanced by a factor proportional toe. This enhancement is due to the pressure wave set up in the interstitial gas in the porous sample and this enhancement has been reported by a number of groups [12-14].In this Letter we report the observation of anomalously large enhancement of the PAS signal for certain surface IR modes on the surface of amorphous silica particles. This observation differs from the previous reports in that certain surface modes are enhanced by over an order of magnitude compared to the bulk IR modes. Although the reasons for this enhancement of the surface IR modes in PAS are not understood at present, this observation may open up new approaches to the study of surfaces. Results of these initial observations are given in this Letter. ·Experimental studies reported here were carried out on an FTIR spectrometer (Mattson Instruments, Model Cygnus 100) equipped with an MCT detector. The same instrument was used for PAS studies in conjunction with an MTEC (Model 100) PA cell. The sample cell and the spectrometer are continuously flushed with dry, CO2 free air obtained by the use of Balston Instruments Air Dryer Filter System (Model 75-60). Usually data were collected for 32 scans at 4 cm-I resolution, although both scan and resolution can be varied. For FTIR studies, samples were mixed with IR-grade KBr and pelletised. For PAS, no sample preparation is necessary and data are ratioed against dry carbon black [4, 5]."

Jan 1, 1989

By Harry M. Conger

Thirty years ago, the U.S. gold mining industry was hanging on by its fingernails. Save for one great mine, the Homestake, most production was coming from copper smelters such as Kennecott and Magma. Even Homestake itself was under great pressure from rising costs and a fixed price for gold. The outlook was dim, to say the least. Today, as it has for most of the past decade, the American gold mining industry stands among the world leaders in production, and in the development of mining and mineral processing technology. What caused this dramatic change? Obviously, the freeing of the gold price was a major factor, as was the decline in South African production, but these events alone could not have created the U.S. strength we see today. It was technology, investment, and the determination of miners to build an entirely new industry that were the indispensable ingredients. The U.S. Bureau of Mines, with great foresight, had begun the research that led to heap leaching before the gold price began to rise, and Newmont had committed to build a small mill at Carlin, a move then considered quite risky. From that point, the U.S. gold mining industry was placed on lower-grade ores then being found in Nevada and elsewhere, but it was soon apparent that we would have to develop new technologies to deal with more refractory ores, carbonaceous as well as sulfide-bearing. This is now being done with considerable success. Despite its success, or perhaps because of it, the gold mining industry has come under pressure from various groups who characterize their activities as motivated by "public interest." The public interest they refer to properly include the health and safety workers and impacted communities, as well as protection of the environment, and with these concerns we miners have relatively little argument. In fact, we consider health, safety and the environment among our highest priorities, and not just because regulations may require us to do so. The argument, however, is not about the regulation of a viable mining industry, it is about a well-organized movement to attack and condemn mining in the media and to misrepresent its importance to the Nation and its willingness to accept responsible regulation. Once largely local or regional, the interest groups to which I refer are now quite large, national in scope, and even becoming international. This trend, taken together with finances raised from their dues and contributions, would make the interest groups formidable adversaries for mining, but their grip on the media enormously magnifies their influence. Unfortunately, it also makes possible the wide dissemination of incomplete, incorrect or slanted information. I am not here to "bash" the interest groups. On the whole, I believe that many of them have made positive contributions to society. As conservationists, however, I question their authority to make, or foster, decisions about which American industries and communities live and which die. To illustrate, I would like to present for your consideration the problem of cyanide, one of the issues over which the gold mining industry is most threatened. CYANIDE-POISON OR MIRACLE SOLVENT? Let me get this out of the way right up front: cyanide in most of its chemical forms is toxic. In some forms it is also listed as a carcinogen. These are adverse characteristics cyanide shares with a considerable number of industrial chemicals, including some that are widely used without the stringent regulations already in place for the mining uses of cyanide. In these uses, by the way, the risk to humans comes from direct ingestion of cyanide or cyanide-bearing solutions, or from the accidental acidification of solutions leading to release of hydrocyanic acid gas. That these risks are under control in mining can be seen from the fact that, in modern U.S. practice, there has never been a documented fatality attributed to cyanide! Because of its toxicity, cyanide cannot enter and be accumulated in the food chain. It can, however, be a threat to birds and animals that ingest cyanide-bearing solutions. Protection against this is, quite properly, a responsibility of individual mining operations, and considerable sums are spent each year to prevent or reduce bird and animal exposures. It should be evident, though, that many human activities, including highway traffic, windmills, use of pesticides and the like, result in bird and animal losses. Mining's use of cyanide, and the measures taken to protect birds and animals, should be considered in context. Cyanide must be kept out of surface streams and groundwater, and existing regulations mandate this. Any cyanide residues left in leach heaps, waste dumps and disused facilities must be eliminated, and we have proven technologies to do this now, just as we have means to detoxify tailings prior to disposal. The gold mining industry decries those rare instances when irresponsible operators fail to deal with contamination, and agrees that they should be held responsible. We do not agree, however, that the great majority of responsible companies should be punished, in advance, for accidents that have never happened. So much for the poison, what about the "miracle solvent?" Is that an overstatement? Well, consider the fact that gold has been called "noble" from earliest times, because it does not oxidize under atmospheric exposure, and that it appeared to the ancients to be utterly insoluble. Later generations of scientists did discover that it could be dissolved, but only by a combination of acids so potent that it became known as aqua Regia. Later still, it was found that chlorine would also dissolve gold, and attempts were made to base commercial processes on this, without a great deal of success. It remained

Jan 1, 1995

By Fredrick D. Palmer

The World is Turning to Coal Peabody?s View ?We believe the world is increasingly energy-short, led by unprecedented demand from population centers and economic hubs in Asia, the Middle East and South America ?This occurs as:?Traditional energy sources are clearly constrained, requiring coal-based alternatives?Energy-rich nations leverage political gain from their assets, and nations urgently look to improve energy security ?In this environment:?Oil, coal and gas face a greater long-term convergence, ?Coal?s traditional regionalized nature becomes global, and ?Coal?s compact energy form becomes an attractive source for liquids and substitute natural gas ?The world is blessed with an abundance of coal to help meet all human energy needs

Jan 1, 2008

By G. S. Scott

Mine fires have occurred since the mining of coal was begun, and they are still occurring. The resulting economic waste may become considerable (219),3 especially if a fire is allowed to assume major proportions or to get beyond control temporarily. It is important, therefore, to act promptly whenever a fire is suspected and to have every action count. To do this effectively, it is necessary to know at the earliest possible moment and thereafter what is happening in a remote or inaccessible area. It is equally important to know before¬hand what may be expected as a result of any proposed combative measure. The logical method of combatting a fire demands the cooperation of both mining engineer and chemist. They should decide the course of action to be taken, drawing upon the mining engineer's intimate knowledge of the physical structure of the fire area, the cost and time required for proposed operations, and the probable efficiency with which they could be carried out, and upon the chemist's knowledge of the results to be expected therefrom.

Jan 1, 1944

By James W. Echerd

Anthracite preparation developments, particularly in the early days of the anthracite industry, formed the basis for the modern coal preparation plants that have become so essential to the coal industry today. The anthracite industry, from early in the 19th century until relatively recently, was a leader in mining, preparation and marketing of coal, and played a leading role in the development of the industrial America we know today. Anthracite was discovered in America in about 1760--the story of Necho Allen is well known--but the rediscoveries leading to mining operations took place about 50 years later. The Wurtz brothers in 1815 at Scranton, the Smith brothers at Wilkes-Barre in 1807, Beach in Hazleton in about 1814, and Boyd in 1816 at Shamokin were all instrumental in promoting early mining and marketing of anthracite (J3. The early canals and railroads were built for the specific purpose of moving anthracite to the market areas. Eventually, the industry grew until, in 1917, it reached a production zenith of a little over 100,000,000 tons, representing about 20 percent of the total coal output in the United States. Almost half of the anthracite produced that year was consumed for domestic heating, a utilization that had dominated the industry for almost 100 years. Initially, anthracite had to be used by gunsmiths and blacksmiths, after which had followed the consumption of extensive quantities for railroads, blast furnaces and foundries, and electric power generation. Most of the markets have been lost to coke, oil, and natural gas. Near the anthracite regions, however, significant quantities are still used for domestic heating, power generation, carbon black manufacture, blending with bituminous coal to make metallurgical coke and fuel, and for other industrial purposes. Thus, anthracite production has not been entirely committed to history, but remains an active industry that follows modern practices in the mining, preparation, shipping, and utilization of a fuel that is still a valuable adjunct to the national economy. In fact, its inherent low sulfur content may make it an important fuel of the future. Estimates indicate there are reserves of anthracite to last for 300 years at a consumption rate of 50,000,000 tons/year. Anthracite Preparation Yesterday A 170-year history of the anthracite industry obviously is not the purpose of this discussion. A complete history of anthracite preparation, the rather unglamorous step in the processing of "mine run" hard coal to make it suitable for the user, is also not practical. Hence, the purpose of this report is to trace the development of some of the most important processes used through the years to meet a part of the demand for energy developed by our modern society. Anthracite preparation in the early days of the industry consisted solely of separating slate from the coal, by hand, underground (Z). This method prevailed for almost 20 years until wrought iron hand rakes were introduced to separate the large and small sizes. Shortly thereafter, the first attempts were made to size and clean the coal aboveground. The coal was dumped on a perforated cast iron plate, and men used sledge hammers to break the larger pieces into smaller sizes suitable for the market. The smallest sizes--that is, the material that went through the plate--were thrown away because they had no value at that time--a concept that existed for many years and actually was the basis for the subsequent "river" coal production and the many silt banks which are landmarks in the anthracite region. The larger sizes, at that time, sold for 50 cents per ton. The Batten breaker, or roll crusher, was invented in 1844, followed soon thereafter by the Snell-Diehm breaker (A). The latter had disadvantages, including excessive waste and fixed product size, but it later was improved in these respects. A breaker was also developed at Minersville, Pa., at about the same time that processed 200 tons of coal per day, using roll crushers and circular screens (1). Handpicking, from the beginning of anthracite preparation, was an important part of the cleaning process and was still being practiced as late as 1950. It was this process that involved the "breaker" boys of coal region lore. How much good handpicking accomplished depended on how much impurity was present in the coal--the more the impurities, the greater the reduction in ash. Thus, high-impurity streams were significantly improved, whereas picking of relatively clean coal was mainly to show an effort to make a quality product. As indicated, picking is largely a visual operation. It was and is wasteful of coal in the larger sizes since some good coal is always associated with the bad. However, it was probably much more effective' in the larger than the smaller sizes.

Jan 1, 1971

By H. Merton Ruth

THE northern anthracite fields, although facing the same economic problems as the southern fields, are confronted with the additional problem of fast dwindling reserves of anthracite which can be conventionally and economically won. The mining of coal which remains in thin beds and the recovery of pillars from areas heretofore considered unrecoverable, either by reason of cost or surface restriction, pose problems of in- creasing importance to the economic life of the northern field operations. Successful approaches have Been made to this problem and other work is being performed that holds promise. There exists in the northern anthracite field millions of tons of solid coal, the recovery of which has not been too successful due to the following inherent operating faults: inability to concentrate producing areas; the great quantities of rock to be cut and handled, lack of consideration of proper sequence and speed of second mining, and the continued use of the mine car as the basis of payment. A mining system that has successfully solved these major problems has been in operation in the Scranton area since 1944. Over 1% million tons have been produced from veins varying from 3 to 4% ft thick by this method, which is known as the multiple panel-triangular system-conveyor mining.

Jan 1, 1950