Search Documents

By John W. Frey

[Minerals, generally of great geological age, are to a very large extent the material basis of what we know as modern civilization. In most of the so-called civilized world the use f minerals has become such a commonplace that it is easy to se sight of their importance. It was the use of minerals, obably more than anything else, that made it possible for e American people to expand from the Atlantic seaboard the Pacific in a little over one hundred years. As the 1 to use the natural wealth at hand constitutes a funda¬ental element in American life, there seems to be justification for the thought that American geography is largely mineral geography. Of all American environmental reactions, the most striking are those which have come about through the use of the metals and the power fuels. If we turn to the ancient industry of agriculture, we find very little that is unique in North America except those developments which have come about through the use of machinery and transportation, both of which are contingent upon the use of minerals. Practically every crop now grown n North America was grown in some part of Europe before merica was discovered. One can point out exceptions to statement but in general it is true. Analysis of the es of North American agriculture shows that the outstand¬ characteristics are: regional specialization (i.e., the Economic Geographer; Chief, Petroleum Section, Minerals Division, u of Foreign and Domestic Commerce.]

Jan 1, 1932

By M. J. Price

The usage of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is increasing rapidly throughout the Mining Industry, especially in the Industrial Minerals sector. GIS provides an efficient and robust link between spatial (often CADD) and tabular (database/spreadsheet) components. Mineral economists and corporate planners employ GIS to perform market analyses, to source raw materials, and to schedule and monitor deliveries to customers. Exploration and acquisition groups apply spatial analysis to identify high quality resources that meet economic guidelines. Mining regulators and environmental affairs departments expedite and monitor permitting, environmental compliance, and best management practices reclamation through GIS data management and Electronic Permitting. Operations staffs monitor overburden removal, material extraction, quality control, and stockpile volumes with GIS. This paper summarizes the many aspects of GIS in Industrial Minerals. It also introduces and addresses issues and concerns commonly encountered during a mining GIS implementation.

Jan 1, 2001

By J. R. Piper

“Old Borate,” located in the Calico Mountains east of Barstow, California, lead domestic colemanite production from 1884 through 1907. Mineral exploration at “Old Borate” in the early 1980's, examined borate mineralization in Tertiary lacustrine strata. Surface sample and drill hole locations, geology and structure, were hand-drafted on paper maps. To re-evaluate this data, the information was digitized using Geographic Information Systems software. Digital Elevation Model based terrain modeling integrated surficial samples with drill hole data to locate favorable drilling targets. Structural relationships were used to identify hypothetical resources formed by the leaching of boron from surface exposures, redeposited at depth.

Jan 1, 2001

By Robert Bachus, Jamey B. Rosen

"Abstract Large scale In Situ Barrier Wall Construction projects, specifically those related to earth dams, dikes, and levees, frequently require stringent quality control measures to ensure the success of the wall. This presentation discusses the applications of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology to capture information from multiple data streams and provide geotechnical feedback, quality control, and project control feedback. Techniques used to geospatially analyze verticality data from secant piles and panels will be demonstrated. Examples will be presented from barrier wall installations at two sites owned by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE): the Wolf Creek Dam in Kentucky, and Center Hill Dam in Tennessee.IntroductionDeep foundation installations require contractors to collect a substantial amount of information over the course of a project, both for internal quality control of construction progress and for demonstrating compliance with customer or owner specifications. Methods of collecting information are constantly improving, bringing with it the need for a systemic approach to managing the increasing amounts and types of data. Handling these diverse types of data presents challenges with both budget and schedule demands. This paper discusses some techniques for adding or increasing quality control in barrier wall constructions by consolidating, visualizing and analyzing data using relational database and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology, collectively referred to as Information Management System (IMS) development. The IMS concept is designed to facilitate the collection, transfer and processing of data and provide an easy way to remotely access and visualize construction progress.The remainder of this paper presents the needs and objectives of an IMS applied to quality control in barrier wall construction, the components and data flows involved, the capabilities and user interfaces of the systems and the benefits for the end users. Examples are presented throughout from case study projects including: a pile barrier wall applied in the rehabilitation at the Wolf Creek Dam in Kentucky (under contract to the Treviicos-Soletanche Joint Venture), and a secant pile barrier wall currently under construction in the rehabilitation of the Center Hill Dam in Tennessee (under contract to Bauer Foundations Corporation) (both owned by the Nashville District of the USACE)."

Jan 1, 2014

By Michael Arnold, Robert Bachus, Michael Bracher, Jamey Rosen, Robert Roff

"For a high hazard USACE facility, the Center Hill Dam in Tennessee, several disparate streams of data were compiled into a single geospatial and relational enterprise data management system to store, analyze, visualize and distribute the data collected during installation of a deep cutoff wall. These data streams included historical drawings and pre-construction plans and grouting records; geological data from boreholes; attributes of barrier wall elements; element verticality data analyzed from multiple measurement methods; and concrete field and laboratory analytical data. A previously developed data management system developed by the authors, WallTracker, was extensively modified to also include manually collected and real-time measurements from several types of dam monitoring instruments. The system now uses enterprise database technologies with Geographical Information Systems capabilities to manage and relate these data streams into a common platform and allows access to the raw and interpreted data via web and desktop-based interactive tools, including interactive map and cross-sectional viewers and other graphical and tabular reporting tools. One of the primary benefits of this system is the neartransparent interaction that is possible with the Nashville District of USACE on the project. These techniques can now be effectively incorporated into systems that address the unique construction and data management tracking requirements for dams, dikes, and levees.IntroductionThe Center Hill Dam rehabilitation, as with other deep foundation installations, requires the contractor to collect a substantial amount of information over the course of the project, both for internal quality control of construction progress and methods, and for demonstrating compliance with owner specifications. This paper discusses techniques used at Center Hill Dam for consolidating, visualizing and analyzing construction and instrumentation data using relational database and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology, collectively referred to as an Information Management System (IMS).The remainder of this paper presents the needs and objectives of the IMS, the components and data flows involved, the capabilities and user interfaces of the systems, and the benefits for the end users."

Jan 1, 2017

By AIME AIME

MINERAL production of the United States is valued at over five billion dollars a year at present and the industry employs close to a million workmen, yet such maps as are available that might indicate the geographical distribution of this industry show only the location of coal and oil fields and of other mineral deposits. No recent map is available that shows this distribution in a quantitative way. The purpose of the maps and graphs here presented is twofold: (1) to give the mining engineer a clear conception of the relative value and the pattern of distribution of minerals in the United States; (2) to test the so-called block-pile (or grouped pillar) system of statistical mapping, which makes this presentation possible. (I discussed this method of mapping in an article which appeared in Economic Geology in 1939, Vol. 15, p. 185-188.)

Jan 1, 1941

Map

Jan 1, 1938

Map

Jan 1, 1941

Map

Jan 1, 1939

ALABAMA Altoona.-Cain, J. America.-Foreman, J. T. Anniston.-Cowie, L. K. Foster, R. N. Rogers, R. F. White, H. E. Ashland.-Sturdevant, J. C. Bessemer. Ball, E. M. McKenzie. W. C., Jr. Morgan, C. Birmingham.-Abbott, C. E. Adler, J. E. Aldrich, T. H. Aldrich, T. H., Jr. Ashton, J. J. Burgin, G. E.

Jan 1, 1923

NORTH AMERICA ALASKA Anchorage.-Strandberg, H. College.-Barber, R. J. Burns, W. T. Henricksen, R. Henton, H. M. Joesting. H. R. Comet.-Albertson, F. E. Douglas.-Cahill, W. E. Carlson, L. Fairbanks.-Andregg. J. N. Coats. R. R.

Jan 1, 1938

NORTH AMERICA. CANADA Canadian Army Overseas. Ball, H. D. Bridges. C. Butterill, H. J. If. Ladner, F. E. Lane, H. C. Alillar, W. A. ALBERTA Calgary.-Chonette, W. C. Clark, L. At. Corbett, C. S. de Hart, J. B. Dingman, C. W. Fath. A. E. Fulton. J. If. Cray, J. G. Johnson. R. V. McCutchin, J. A. *Slipper, S. E. Vin Buckirk H. A.

Jan 1, 1944

ALABAMA Aldrich -Thomas, D A Altoona -Cain, J Anniston -Cowie, L K Walmsley, W N White, H E Ashland -Sturdevant, J C Bankhead -Connaway, M B Bessemer-Ball, E M McKenzie, W C, Jr Mitchell, F R Morgan, C Thompson, N E Birmingham -Abbott, C E Adams, J H

Jan 1, 1923

NORTH AMERICA ALASKA Anchorage.-Strandberg, H. Tuck, R. Coal Creek.-Moore, E. G. Spencer, W. W. College.-Hance, J. H. Henricksen, R. Henton, H. M. Comet.-Albertson, F. E. Cordova.-O'Neill, W. A. Douglas.-Cahill, W. E. Fairbanks.-Crawford, J. D. Earling, R., B. Fowler. D. A.

Jan 1, 1937

Note Any member who desires to be designated as being "Available for Consulting Work" can arrange it simply by sending a written request to the office of the Secretary of the Institute The following list of members is primarily arranged geographically, with secondary consideration to political subdivisions arranged alphabetically First, the states of the United States , then other North America, in order Alaska, Canada, Mexico, the West Indies, and Central America Then cones South America, Europe, Africa, and Asia, each including the near by islands associated with those continents Australia, the islands to the north, and the Pacific islands except Japan are grouped together under Oceania The various countries are indexed on the preceding page NORTH AMERICA UNITED STATES ALABAMA America -Dyar, G C Anniston -DePriest, S H Klugh, B G Lefforge, J W Auburn Poor, R S Bankhead -Armstrong, W D Bessemer -Beck, A IV, Jr Carnes, D Chabot, L S , Jr Creveling, J C

Jan 1, 1952

[NORTH AMERICA UNITED STATES ALABAMA Birmingham CORD, Richard H DISMUKES, Edward B Citronelle PERRIN, Huey P Fairfield PAGEL, Herbert Ervin Huntsville ENG, Harvard KELLEY, Dean W WAGGONER, J B Mobile HORNER, William L PETROUTSON, Peter C Montgomery GAMBLE, Halbert R Redstone RAWLINGS, William E Tuscaloosa MASON, William L University CUDWORTH, James R JONES, Walter B]

Jan 1, 1961

NORTH AMERICA Number Members Alaska 36 Canada 323 Mexico 184 Newfoundland 3 United States Alabama 40 Arizona 111 Arkansas 8 California 646 Colorado 171 Connecticut 90 Delaware 21 District of Columbia 136 Florida 16 Georgia 7 Idaho 66 Illinois 208 Indiana 66 Iowa 11 Kansas 24 Kentucky 32

Jan 1, 1934

[NORTH AMERICA UNITED STATES ALABAMA Birmingham Cord, Richard H. Dlsmukes, Edward B. Hunter, Robert A. Citronelle Perrin, Huey P. Fairfield Pagel, Herbert Ervin Fairhope Ruffles, William R. Huntsville Eng, Harvard Kelley, Dean W. Waggoner, J. B. Weber, Thomas C. Mobile Hankins, James D. Horner, William L. Petroutson, Peter C. University Cudworth, James R. Jones, Walter B. Mason, William L.]

Jan 1, 1961

[NORTH AMERICA UNITED STATES ALABAMA AUBURN Sturm & O'Brien, Consult. Engrs. °Sturm, Rolland G. BESSEMER Granger, W. C. BIRMINGHAM Air Reduction Sales Crockett, John M. Amer. Cast Iron Pipe Co. Carter, Sam F., Jr. Donoho, C. K. Anderson Elec. Corp. Davis, Moss V. J. B. Clow & Sons Neptune, Maurice D. Connors Steel Div. °Sandelin, Robert W. Hayes Aircraft Corp. Ricketts, W. E., Jr. Willhelm, A. Clyde, Jr. McWaine Cast Iron King, O. H. Worthington, B. W. Shook & Fletcher Sup. Co. Gearhart, Thomas A. Southern Res. Inst. Dismukes, Edward B., Wheelahan, Edmund J. Thomas Foys Miller, Ralph M. Union Carbide Metals, Co. Brandler, Edgar A. U. S. Pipe & Fdry. Co. Clay, Donald H. Unaffiliated Berg, H. A. Caldwell, H. A. Gilmer, H. U. Harris, Thomas H. Templeton, J. B.]

Jan 1, 1961

[NORTH AMERICA UNITED STATES ALABAMA ADAMSVILLE U. S. Steel Corp. Neason, James E. ALBERTVILLE Thompson Floral Co. Loudermilk, E. L. ANNISTON No Data Supplied Bonnichsen, Bill BESSEMER U. S. Steel Corp.-TCI Div. Beck, Adolph W., Jr. Boyle, James R. Cofield, William H. *Evans, James D. F., II *Guyton, Jesse C. Johnson, Leland H. Tetley, Albert L. No Data Supplied Crockard, F. H. Fisher, Joe T. Griffin, Joseph M. McFarland, E. A. Mohr, Henry E. Neal, George M. Walker, Wilber D.]

Jan 1, 1961