Search Documents

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

CALCULATION OF MINE HEAD LOSSES FROM ALTIMETER SURVEY DATA USBM PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - MINERAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT USBM USBM USBM THIS PROGRAM CALCULATES PRESSURE LOSSES USING THE USBM METHOD GIVEN USBM IN USBH IC 7809 BY MCELROY AND KINGERY.1957. THE MAJOR DIFFERENCE USBM BETWEEN THIS PROGRAM AND THE CITED REFERENCE IS THE TREATMENT OF AIR USBM

Jan 1, 1977

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

C THRM 1 C CALCULATION OF MINE HEAD LOSSES FROM ALTIMETER SURVEY DATA TURN 2 C PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - MINERAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THRM 3 C THRM 4 C THRM 5 C THIS PROGRAM CALCULATES PRESSURE LOSSES USING THERMODYNAMIC RELATION- THRM 6 C SHIPS BASED ON POLYTROPIC FLOW BETWEEN STATIONS. FOR REFERENCE SEE THRM 7 C "A NEW TREATMENT OF MINE BAROMETER SURVEYS" BY M. J. MCPHERSON IN THRM 8 C 'THE MINING ENGINEER' NO. 109, VOL. 129, P 23. THRM 9 C THRM 10 C THRM 11 C THRM 12 C IDENTIFICATION OF ARRAYS THRM 13 C NOTE THE PROGRAM HAS BEEN DIMENTIONED FOR FOURTY (40) DATA POINTS THRM 14 C BASEC(6;2) BASE INSTRUMENT TEMPERATURE CORRECTIONS THRM 15 C TRAVC(6,2) TRAVERSE INSTRUMENT TEMPERATURE CORRECTIONS THRM 16 C BASER(I) BASE INSTRUMENT READING THRM 17 C TRAVR(I) TRAVERSE INSTRUMENT READING THRM 18 C TDRY(I) DRY BULB TEMPERATURE AT TRAVERSE STATION THRM 19 C TWET(I) WET BULB TEMPERATURE AT TRAVERSE STATION THRM 20 C ELEV(I) ELEVATION AT TRAVERSE STATION THRM 21 C VEL(I) AIR VELOCITY AT TRAVERSE STATION THRM 22 C TBDRY(I) DRY BULD TEMPERATURE AT BASE STATION THRM 23 C BASC(I) BASE READING CORRECTED FOR INSTRUMENT TEMPERATURE THRM 24 C TRAV(I) TRAVERSE READING CORRECTED FOR INSTRUMENT TEMPERATURE THRM 25 C BBASE(I) TEMPERATURE CORRECTED BASE READING IN BAROMETRIC THRM 26 C PRESSURE THRM 27 C BTRAV(I) TEMPERATURE CORRECTED TRAVERSE READING IN BAROMETRIC THRM 28 C PRESSURE THRM 29 C BTRAVS(I) BAROMETRIC TRAVERSE READING CORRECTED FOR ATMOSPHERIC THRM 30 C CHANGES THRM 31 C RELHUM(I) RELATIVE HUMIDITY THRM 32 C ASW(I) AIR SPECIFIC WEIGHT TURN 33 C R(I) GAS CONSTANT FOR MOIST AIR THRM 34 C STPRES(I) STATIC PRESSURE CHANCE BETWEEN STATIONS (I) AND (1-1) THRM 35 C TOPRES(I) TOTAL PRESSURE CHANCE BETWEEN STATIONS (I) AND (I-1) TURN 36

Jan 1, 1977

By Thomas V. Falkie, R. Venkataramani

Table

Jan 1, 1972

By R. V. Ramani, A. S. C. Owili-eger

? THIS PROGRAM SIMULATES METHANE FLOWRATES THROUGH THE GOAL ? SEAM BY THE GAUSS-SEIDEL ITERATIVE TECHNIQUE. THE MODEL IS A TWO ? DIMENSIONAL SYSTEM. THE ITERATIVE FORM OF THE GAUSS-SEIDEL IS ? OBTAINED FROM A PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION OF FLOW BY CENTRAL ? FINITE-DIFFERENCING APPROXIMATION SCHEME ? NPRESS IS THE NUMBER OF SPECIFIED PRESSURES EXCLUDING ? RESERVOIR AND FACE PRESSURES ? NQUAN IS THE NUMBER OF SPECIFIED FLOW QUANTITY.... EXCEPT FLOW ? OUT OF THE FACE. THIS- QUANTITY CAN BE POSITIVE(INJECTION) OR ? NEGATIVE ( PRODUCTION) ? XPERM(I,J) I S THE DIRECTIONAL PERMEABILITY IN THE X-DIRECTION AT THE POINT (I,J) ? YPERM(I,J) IS THE DIRECTIONAL PERMEABILITY IN THE Y-DIRECTION ? AT THE POINT (I,J) ? RESEP' IS THE RESERVOIR PRESSURE ? FACEP IS THE FACE PRESSURE. THIS PRESSURE IS ASSUMED TO BE ? APPROXIMATELY ATMOSPHERIC ? LENGTH, WIDTH, AND THICK ARE THE ZONE OR MEDIUM DIMENSIONS * PUHL I S A DUMMY NAME FOR VISCOSITY ? DMAXI IS VARIABLE NAME FOR INITIAL MAXIMUM ERROR OF ITERATION ? DMAXF IS A VARIABLE NAME FOR FINAL MAXIMUM ERROR OF ITERATION ? NITER IS A VARIABLE NAME FOR STORAGE OF NUMBER OF ITERATIONS ? RAD IS A VARIABLE NAME FOR THE SPECTRAL RADIUS OF THE GAUSS¬ ? SEIDEL MATRI-X. THIS PARAMETER ALSO MEASURES THE RATE OF ? CONVERGENCE OF THE ITERATION ? KOUNT IS AN ITERATION COUNTER ? MAXIT IS THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATION SPECIFIED BY THE USER # EPS IS THE MAXIMUM RESIDUAL ALLOWABLE ERROR-FOR CONVERGENCE

Jan 1, 1974

By David A. Monaghan, Kenneth R. Maser, Adi R. Gurdar, D. Randolph Berry

APPENDIX B - DEVELOPMENT OF FOAM-CONCRETE SLURRY MINE SEALANT 1. Introduction This appendix describes the results of an experimental development and laboratory evaluation of foam-concrete as a rapid setting, lightweight, self-supporting mine sealant material. Foam concrete, otherwise known as Aerated Concrete, is a form of lightweight concrete whose structure consists of air bubbles held together by a hardened cement mortar. Its principal applications are found in roofing, insulation, shock absorbing, and backfill. The air bubbles in foam concrete are formed either by chemical reaction in the wet, placed mortar, or by introducing a stable foam into the mortar during mixing. The mortar is usually a cement slurry with fine sand or fly ash as filler. Our attention focused on preformed foam concrete, since this is most adaptable to field applications. Equipment is available,* which simultaneously mixes and pumps a slurry of foam concrete. Such a slurry can be produced at a rate of up to 50 yards/hr and has been pumped in a 2-inch-diameter hose 1000-feet horizontally and 250 feet vertically up without significant bubble deterioration. One very attractive feature associated with the use of foam concrete concerns site logistics. Foam concrete can be generated with densities as low as 20 lbs/ft3, and hence the total number of

Jan 1, 1973

This paper "On Coal" was published in three issues of The Western Gleaner in 1814. Name of author is not given. This magazine was started by Cramer, Spear & Eichbaum, in Pittsburgh, Pa., in December 1813, and ran for about two years. Copies are very rare, and this one is made from an original in the Darlington Library, University of Pittsburgh. This is almost certainly the first general article on coal published west of the Allegheny Mountains, and one of the earliest in this country. ON COAL Its Natural History-Mining of Coal-Phenomena occasioned by Fire-damp-Method of Coking-Distillation of Tar from Pit-coal-Gas-light-Coal, a Manure I. NATURAL HISTORY OF COAL There are few productions of nature which present to the philosopher a wider field of investigation than pit-coal. A substance highly inflammable is found in the deep recesses of the earth, sometimes loaded with numerous superincumbent strata of hard rock, and extending frequently along with these strata through a vast expanse of territory. Though metals may be said to be inflammable substances, as they combine more or less rapidly with oxygen when placed under particular circumstances, yet the character of rapid combustion with disengagement of light and heat, seems to belong. principally to such substances as are derived either from the animal or vegetable kingdom. That this is probably the case with regard to coal we are further induced to believe, by the remarkable circumstance, that the chemical analysis of this natural production yields especially, though in various proportions, those materials which constitute essentially the vegetable. And if any thing was wanting to confirm, us in that opinion we might trace in a number of fossile substances the gradual transition of the vegetable into the state of mineral coal. This fact is so intimately connected with the natural history of coal, that we cannot think it superfluous to give it some farther development. Among the great number of principles which the chemist is capable of tracing in the vegetable kingdom, the presence of extract, resin and fibre seem to form the characteristical marks of plants.-If vegetable matter be boiled in water, and the water, after having been strained and filtered, be exposed for some time to the open air, a flocculent precipitate takes `place from every part of the liquor; which soon subsides to the bottom of the vessel containing it. This is the extract; altered, indeed, by exposure, and now no longer soluble in water, a change which is supposed to depend on the absorption of oxygen; and if, by any means the proportion of oxygen be increased, the extract gradually becomes of a darker color, blackens, and approaches to the state of charred wood.

Jan 1, 1942

By Herbert Clark Hoover, Lou Henry Hoover

As stated in the preface, the nomenclature to be adopted for weights and measures has presented great difficulty. Agricola uses, throughout, the Roman and the Romanized Greek scales, but in many cases he uses these terms merely as lingual equivalents for the .German quantities of his day. Moreover the classic language sometimes failed him, whereupon he coined new Latin terms adapted from the Roman scale, and thus added further confusion. We can, perhaps, make the matter dearer by an illustration of a case in weights. The Roman centumpondium, composed of zoo librae, the old German ceniner of 100 pfundt, and the English hundredweight of 1112 pounds can be called lingual equivalents. The first weighs about 494,600 Troy grains, the second 721,900, and the third 784,000. While the divisions of the centumpondium and the centner are the same, the Libra is divided into 12 unciae and the pfundt into 16 unizen, and in most places a summation of the units given proves that the author had in mind the Roman ratios. However, on p. 509 he makes the direct statement that the centumpondium weighs 146 librae, which would be about the correct weight if the centumpondium referred to was a ceniner. If we take an example such as " each centumpondium of lead contains one uncia of silver", and reduce it according to purely lingual equivalents, we should find that it runs 24.3 Troy ounces per short ton, on the basis of Roman values, and 18.25 ounces per short ton, on the basis of old German. If we were to translate these into English lingual equivalents of one ounce per hundredweight, then the value would be 17.9 ounces per short ton. [ ]

Jan 1, 1950

By Cecil E. Lester

Since the advent of coal mining, the minimal lighting in the under¬ground working place has been an obstacle to the safe and efficient performance of the miner's many tasks. Compounding this problem is the fact that the machines being operated in the working place are so large that the vertical and horizontal clearances around the machinery are severely limited. Consequently, in these poorly lighted and congested working places, the machine operator is unable to utilize his peripheral vision. He cannot see hazards as they develop and, too often, cannot react in time to avoid serious injury or death to himself or his fellow miners. The greatest hazard to miners inby the last open crosscut is from falls of roof which are often preceded by warning signs such as falling rock fragments, roof supports taking weight, or a sudden reduction in the height of the working place. These warning signs often go undectected because the machine operator's attention is focused on the small circle of light emitted from his cap lamp. Congress recognized the illumination deficiencies, and, in the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, charged the Secretary of the Interior with the authority and responsibility for development and promulgation of minimum standards for illuminating working places in coal mines. These standards have been developed and, as stated in the April 1, 1976 Notice, Federal Register, Volume 41, No. 64, will be promulgated on October 1, 1976, as mandatory regulations under Section 75.1719, Title 30, Code of Federal Regulations. The regulations require that the designated surfaces within the miner's normal field of vision be illuminated to 0.06 foot-lamberts while self¬propelled mining equipment is being operated in the working places. The term "working place" is defined in the Act as "the area of a coal mine inby the last open crosscut".

Jan 1, 1976

By R. V. Ramani, A. S. C. Owili-eger

List of Numbers

Jan 1, 1974

By C. B. Manula, R. L. Sanford, R. A. Rivell

A - Contains the coordinate pair information for deriving the co¬efficients of the 3rd degree polynomial which approximates the loading station equation. C(N) - Coefficients for third degree approximating polynomial. I - General DO LOOP variable. K - Position in BRANCH of next character. L - Format specification in DEFINE FILE statement. X - Uniform displacement for random uniform number. Y - Load increment At. AO-A3 - Coefficients of approximating polynomial for loading station equation. GR - Grade direction, or grade resistance. IQ - Counts quadruples of distance grade speed and end of route for determining total distance. IT - Intersection counter in XXXDEF. Il - Station number trip is leaving. Jl - Station number for trip destination. J2-J8 - Motor assignments and functions for given trip. KK - Location of starting grade and distance in DISTGR KK - Position of decimal point in real number. KZ - DO LOOP variable for motor assignment check. LL - Location of ending grade and distance in DISTGR. Ll - Position in IECB of station satisfied. L3 - Next available position for IECB sort. MM - Flag for printing the failure of sanding to overcome slippage. NN - Trip destination in MOTSER RR - Rolling Resistance. XK - Station level or type.

Jan 1, 1974

By David A. Monaghan, Kenneth R. Maser, Adi R. Gurdar, D. Randolph Berry

APPENDIX D DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF ACOUSTIC SEAL CHECKER THEORY 1. Introduction In Section 7 of the report the acoustic seal checker concept was described in a general manner and the parameters which affect the signal level at the microphone were discussed briefly. In this appendix the theoretical basis will be presented and the experimental program described which permitted the extension of the theory into practice. The basic goal of the acoustic seal checker is to relate the reduction in sound pressure level to the size of the residual hole in the fly ash barrier. The smallest hole size that may be measured is determined by the signal to noise ratio, where the noise in this case includes the ambient noise in the mine, the internal microphone noise and the sound transmitted from the acoustic source via the flanking paths through corridors adjacent to the one being sealed. The latter source of noise can be discriminated against, at the expense of increased complexity of the acoustic system, by employing a pulsed source and pulse gating of the microphone signal set to accept sound via the barrier path and to reject the delayed flanking path signals. In order that the acoustic system be insensitive to precise source and microphone location and to permit assessment of system performance on an acoustic power flow basis, a broad frequency band of pseudo-random noise is emitted by the loudspeaker source. The preferred frequency range must be determined, the advantage of a directive source must be assessed, and the necessity

Jan 1, 1973

[ ]

Jan 1, 1997

By David Hoadley, Kenneth R. Maser, Ashok B. Boghani, James E. Billar, D. Randolph Berry, Mackenzie Burnett, Robert H. Trent

APPENDIX G TABLE IX MINE A 1 General Total Employees 3000 Maximum No, of Men Underground/Shift 800 Shifts/Day 3 Type of Ore Copper Daily Production (TPD) 25,000 Mining Method Room and Pillar Vein Dip/Thickness l0°/l5 ft Number of Levels/Max Depth 1/0 to 1800 ft 2 Haulage, Conveyances and Travelway Main Haulage Rubber Tire/10 miles belts Man-Ways - Typical Route of Travel to most Remote Sites Rubber Tired Vehicles Hoists - Capacity/Speed/Depth Depth under construction 3 Ventilation 2,500,000 cfm - 5 surface fans 4 Compressed Air N/A cfm 10" and 12" lines 5 Incendiary Storage 2 day powder 1000 gal fuel oil 6 Communications 1 complete system - all shops, dinner areas, and feeder/breaker stations 2 partial systems 7 Escapeway- Systems Man Check System Section boss log and punch cards Alarm System Mine phones with paging system Posting of Escape Route Maps No Escape Signs Every intersection, fluorescent paint Evacuation Drills 2/yr/shift Refuge Chambers - 1 cinder block - No longer required

Jan 1, 1976

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

MINE VENTILATION NETWORK ANALYSIS

Jan 1, 1977

By Craig Haase

A. Introduction

Jan 1, 2003

By R. V. Ramani, C. B. Manula, A. Owili-Eger

• MINE VENTILATION NETWORK PROBLEM (NATURAL SPLITTING; FIXED • QUANTITY BRANCHES; METHANE SIMULATION; NETWORK TOPOLOGY REVISION; • ABSOLUTE PRESSURE) • NFIXB = NO. OF FIXED QUANTITY BRANCHES • DD(I) = AIR QUANTITY ASSIGNED TO FIXED QUANTITY BRANCH I, IN KCFP • NFBPF = NO. OF FIXED QUANTITY BRANCHES PLUS FAN • NFBPFG = NO. OF FIXED QUANTITY BRANCHES PLUS FAN PLUS METHANE • EMISSION BRANCHES • NBWNVP = NO. OF BRANCHES WITH NATURAL.VENTILATION PRESSURE • NVP(I) = NATURAL VENTILATION PRESSURE ASSOCIATED WITH • THE I-TH BRANCH • NF = NUMBER OF FANS • NB = NUMBER OF BRANCHES • MAXIT = MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS • MAXJ = MAXIMUM NUMBER OF JUNCTIONS • NJ = NUMBER OF JUNCTIONS INVOLVED IN THE SOLUTION * NM = NUMBER OF MESHES • NP = NO. OF POINTS TO DESIGNATE FAN CHARACTERISTIC * Q = QUANTITY OF AIR FLOW IN KCFM • R = RESISTANCE OF AN AIRWAY • WIDTH = AIRWAY DIMENSION • LENGTH = AIRWAY DIMENSION • HEIGHT = AIRWAY DIMENSION • SUMNVP = SUMMATION OF NATURAL VENTILATION PRESSURE FOR ANY MESH • X (I) = QUANTITY OF AIR, IN KCFM, ASSOCIATED WITH THE I-TB POINT • ON A FAN CHARACTERISTIC • E = ERROR FOR CONVERGENCE • FF = FRICTION FACTOR • FX(I) = FAN PRESSURE, INS INCHES OF WATER GAGE, CORRESPONDING • • TO A QUANTITY X(I) • H = HEAD LOSS IN INCHES OF WATER GAGE • I = BRANCH NUMBER • J, J1, J2 = JUNCTION, J1 AND J2 ARE TWO NODES WHICH DEFINE A • BRANCH • KEY = NO. WHICH SIGNALS THE TYPE OF FAN CHARACTERISTIC TO BE • EXPECTED

Jan 1, 1975

By R. V. Ramani, V. T. Burgos, J. A. McClay

The data for Test I describes an underground bituminous coal mine operation in a 48 inch seam, with an estimated production rate of 1,056,000 tons per year. The system includes four continuous mining sections, conveyor belt haulage, and a rail network for supply and personnel transportation. This section illustrates the input data sequence and the various report formats which may be selected for the printing of results. As explained earlier, at the present time, the elements of the Cost Data Library must be read in with the regular data input. Thus, in the input data listing, immediately following the required user input, are cards which contain the inputs of the cost library. Examination of the cost reports indicate the absence of cost values for some categories for which the system would normally be expected to incur costs. This situation has arisen due to the format of the cost data provided in the U. S. Bureau of Mines reports. An example of this is the charge of $20/ton for brattice cloth while no charge is indicated for stoppings. The test report data provided a single figure for ventilation cost without a supplemental breakdown. Thus the cost indicated for brattice cloth is actually the total ventilation cost. These explanations hold true for the data input and output for Test II, Appendix III.

Jan 1, 1975

By R. V. Ramani, C. B. Manula, A. Owili-Eger

PART 1 THE INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA AND THE MINE SCHEMATIC SHOWING THE FLOWS FROM COMPUTER SOLUTIONS FOR APPLICATION I

Jan 1, 1975

By Karl J. C. Harries

"The following is an outline or check sheet of some things that might be looked at when considering the concept of a royalty or royalty provisions. It is not intended as a guide to what is right or wrong (that is for the parties to decide). It does not replace the discussions in this work and is not intended to be a complete or exhaustive compilation of matters to be considered. It presumes that you are familiar with the basic concepts of royalties and has been included as an aide memoire only. Use it as such, with caution and common sense, and amend it to suit your needs. Remember also that brevity can result in inaccuracy or imprecision. This is a danger in many points below.The section references are for the sections where the matter is the main subject of the section – see the index for other sections.Royalty TypesNet Proceeds [§§ 5.8.; 11.4.]• No accepted or understood meaning within industry.• Literal meaning, if not defined, would imply “net operating profit”.• Often defined as net profit with revenue base of proceeds from sale of product.• Should not be used without detailed and clear definition. Net Operating Profit [§§ 5.8.; 11.4. – referred to only]• Net profit without recoupment of pre-production expenditures.• Revenue base: usually proceeds from sale of product.• Operating costs deductible.• Some reserves may be permitted.• Recoupment of some post-production capital expenditures may be permitted.• Not often seen as basis for royalties in Canada."

Jan 1, 2003

By Karl J. C. Harries

"The Table of Contents that follows is only an example and is the Table of Contents from an actual negotiated agreement. It is merely intended to show how an agreement might be set out and the nature of possible provisions. As a negotiated agreement the format was dictated by the negotiations. It is not offered as a precedent of what should be contained in a joint venture agreement (“JVA”), the “proper” sequence of Articles, or a complete listing of the contents of joint venture agreements generally. The set-up used for an agreement should be decided by the parties and be one they consider flows in a logical and workable sequence. This example sets out the “deal” first, followed by the provisions relating to how work is to be carried out and then by administrative provisions necessary to make the agreement work. If you are more comfortable with, say, having the Committee provisions at the beginning, by all means have it drafted that way -- you are going to have to live with the agreement and work under it.Notes:1. The Table of Contents provisions appear in bold print. The italicized sections are annotations, which have been provided in some cases where the heading may not clearly describe the contents. They are not intended to be comprehensive, but refer to some specific matters that are considered to be of interest or to need some clarification.2. The subject matter of many of the articles and paragraphs is discussed or commented upon in the text of the book. Some of section cross-references have been provided. Such references are only to sections where the topic is a principal subject and no attempt has been made to provide a comprehensive indexing.3. Although this particular agreement is a three-party agreement, *B* and *C*, the Owners, are required to act as a unit (see para. 1.09. – § 8.44.), making the agreement effectively a two-party agreement. The parties insisted upon having a decision-making Committee and structuring the agreement accordingly. As is explained in § 8.11., such an arrangement is not recommended and can result in problems.5. See also §§ 8.24., 8.41. and 14.13. for discussions on tables of contents, summaries, and headings."

Jan 1, 2003