Search Documents

By Jason Baird, Seokbin Lim

Run up is a factor in Linear Shaped Charge (LSC) cutting for which an account must be made. It occurs on the initiation segment of the charge, and the cutting performance during this period is significantly lower. Previous investigations by the UMR Explosives Group observed that similar effects occur not only with LSCs but a wide range of other explosives applications, including explosive-driven flux-compression generators. Prior to this investigation, it was believed that the main contributing factors to run up were from the combined effects of explosive run up (detonation pressure), lack of confinement at the free, initiation end of the charge, and penetrator transition from segmented pieces to a long-rod penetrator blade. As an initial step to understanding the mechanics of LSC run up, a series of investigations was performed in which the testing series was divided into several sub-categories (explosive detonation pressure run up, lack of confinement and long-rod penetrator concept) in order to reveal the effect of each on the run up. Predominantly, commercially manufactured LSCs were used for the investigation, and the entire testing was completed by the UMR Explosives Group.

Jan 1, 2006

By V R. Sastry, D P. Singh, N R. Thote

Rock parameters which are uncontrollable impose restrictions on the procurement of desirable fragmentation. Blast design parameters which are controllable prove to be important tool in blasting operations. An attempt was made by the authors to investigate parameters which causes big oversize boulders in overburden blasting. A case study of coal mine is discussed in this paper.

Jan 1, 1995

By Split Engineering Chile Fernando Fernandez

Mathematical modeling in conjunction with mineral characterization is widely used as a method for design and optimization of comminution circuits, to simulate the processes of crushing, grinding and classification. An important input parameter to the simulation models is the Run-of-Mine Particle Size Distribution (ROM PSD). The run-of-mine size distributions due to blasting have a great influence on the performance of a semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill. In this paper, a mine case study was conducted where there are four primary geologic units and the material properties between the four units vary considerably. Also, the mixture of the four unit that will be mined at any given time also vary considerably. This presents a challenge in terms of optimizing the blasting for mill production throughout the mine life. As part of the case study, field rock mass characterization, laboratory rock mechanics tests, and laboratory breakage tests were conducted. The field characterization and rock mechanics tests provide material properties used to simulate the effect of different blast designs on run of mine particle size distributions (ROM PSD). The JKSimBlast software was used for these simulations. The rock breakage tests provide material properties used to simulate crushing and grinding performance. The JKSimMet software was used for these simulations.

Jan 1, 2015

By Jonathan Zimmerling, Rob Alkins

The model of waves emanating from a blast hole proposed by Heelan, and further developed by Blair and Minchinton, provides an approximation of particle motion in an isotropic, continuous and homogenous medium caused by a cylindrical pressure source. Previous work in the literature shows that the shapes of the peak strain and peak particle velocity contours generated by this model are influenced by priming location. This paper presents the results of experimental investigations into the effects of priming position in an explosive column and the resulting shape of the surrounding stress and particle velocity fields. Fifteen emulsion charges were detonated in a limestone quarry, of which eight were bottom primed and seven top primed. The charges were fully confined, with no breakout to any surface. Particle velocity was monitored using tri-axial sensors coupled to the rock using cement, and pressure sensors were placed in water filled boreholes for fourteen of the experiments. Statistically significant differences in peak pressure for bottom and top primed shots were observed. Blair and Minchinton developed two pressure source functions, one of which is scaled using the charge weight scaling law. New models of the explosive pressure source are developed and compared to those found in the literature. These models are directly calibrated by predicting the peak velocities achieved at the known locations of the velocity sensors, then minimizing the residual sum of squares between the predicted and observed peak vibration values. Due to the complexity of the model the residual sum of squares cannot be minimized using standard non-linear optimization techniques, so a stochastic, agent based global optimization method is employed. Models are then cross validated by comparing the relative predicted differences in stress between bottom and top priming position to the observed differences.

Jan 1, 2013

By Sanjay Sengar, Nabiullah Pingua, Saurabh Sahay

In India, more than 80 percent of the total of 557 million metric ton coal production comes from open-cast mines involving large overburden removal with average 1:3.5 stripping ratio which is going to in-crease in future. This operation consumes nearly 0.5 million metric ton explosives consisting of 80-85 percent bulk explosives and remaining 15 to 20 percent non-permitted large diameter explosives. Quali-ties of bulk explosives play an important role in rock blasting. Post blast results like poor fragmentation, tight mucking, toe problems, improper muck profile and lower productivity of mine may require chang-es in explosive loading factor (amount of explosive used per unit of rock blasted ). The explosive load-ing factor is an extremely important index to assess the economy of blasting operation.

Jan 1, 2014

By Dale Preece, Stephen Chung

Development of DMCBLAST-3D is continuing and now includes the capability to simulate the detonation of multiple blastholes in multiple rows that make up a conventional bench blast, either in a rock quarry or a surface coal mine. DMCBLAST-3D is a three-dimensional extension of the proven twodimensional rock blast modeling code, DMCBLAST. DMCBLAST has been under development since 1987 and has successfully predicted the physics, mechanisms and results of a number of different types of rock blasting including, coal mine bench blasting, mineral mine choke blasting and underground stope blasting. Substantial effort has gone into the qualification and verification of DMCBLAST by comparing computer code predictions with real blasts in the field. Comparison with field data has also provided significant guidance to the development of the code.

Jan 1, 2002

By Michael E. Kovach

This discussion is an overview of an approach to drilling and blasting angle holes at Martin Marietta Aggregates. Method of determining burdens, hole depths, angle settings and explosive selection will be discussed in detail with an emphasis on safety and production. Such techniques and methods involve the use of hand-held surveying instruments such as the Abney level, pocket transit and inclinometer along with measuring tape and burden pole. An interesting method developed by Oscar Banfield a retired Martin Marietta and E. I. duPont engineer, for setting the proper angle on a drill will also be presented. This treatise is a discussion of the use of simple yet important tools and techniques a blaster should use to resolve both routine and complex problems encountered during quarry blasting operations.

Jan 1, 1992

By Edward J. Walter

A vibration record is a complex of motions resulting from a combination of direct, reflected and refracted seismic energy that originated at a blast source. Multiple hole blasting using delays further complicates the motion in that overlapping of seismic wave trains may occur when delays do not fire in the programed sequence. This can result in variations in amplitude, frequency and wave-1ength of the vibration. Amplitude may be doubled, frequency may oscillate between the highest and lowest frequencies present and wave-length may approach doubling of the longest wave-length present. These effects can present serious problems to conducting a safe blasting program since increased amplitudes and lower frequencies present higher damage potentials for structures. The development of these effects is described and illustrated graphically to show how these effects can occur.

Jan 1, 1989

By Douglas Lindsey, Glenn Hazen, Shad Sargand

"With the innovation of computational equipment, an exact analysis of structures as dynamic systems is more approachable. Accordingly, the dynamic system can be established, if the natural characteristics such as the natural frequency and the damping fraction of a system are known. Through dynamic analysis, the response of a structure can be predicted from ground vibration, and it becomes possible to forecast the damage potential to the structure with reasonable accuracy. Most vibration will appear as single harmonic or superposition of waves that consists of several harmonics with different frequencies. A vibration signal can be expressed, therefore, as the function of sine waves. If a signal is periodic, the particular harmonic with the smallest frequency will befundamental and frequency of the others will be multiples of the fundamental frequency."

Jan 1, 1993

By B Mohanty

The current basis for rating of commercial explosives is examined, with particular emphasis on calculated bulk and weight strengths, detonation velocity and underwater energy measurement. The calculated strengths still form the basis for selecting explosives for most blasting applications, with the measured detonation parameters serving only as a measure of the quality of the explosive. The major drawbacks with this approach are discussed, in view of the non-ideal nature of commercial explosives and the field conditions prevalent during the blasting operation. A unified approach to rating explosives on the basis of blasting performance rather than calculated energy alone is presented for various types of explosives. This incorporates the relevant field parameters as well as the effect of non-ideal reactions, both of which affect explosive energy release and its transfer to target rock.

Jan 1, 1988

By W. J. Birch

The dedicated documenting of blast design and vibration monitoring results forms part of the best practice methodology for today’s blasting operators. This allows regression curves to be constantly updated and in turn compatible charge weight determinations are based upon the most current data. The point can arise however when so much data becomes agglomerated that variations in blast design, geology or monitoring location response and their effects can pass unobserved and start to have an adverse effect on the forecasting capability of the regression due to a deterioration of the standard error statistic. The simple solution would be to only compile like-for-like blasting returns, but this prospect can quickly become unworkable due to the number of potential variables. In addition it is very difficult to spot subtle variations by simply examining a standard scaled-distance curve mainly due to the intrinsic data scatter that is always present together with the logarithmic nature of the regression curve. If indeed a variation is thought to be apparent, how can the degree and magnitude of its influence to be quantified? The Likelihood Ratio Test when applied to regression data can diagnose subtle variations between data sub-sets and provides a comparative statistic as to the degree of variation. By analysing datasets in such a way, levels of compatibility are obtained, indicating which sets can be combined in order to increase prediction capability.

Jan 1, 2004

By Mark William Withey

Blasting safety in surface mining is a necessary industrial goal. Proper techniques and disciplines exercised during the blasting process enhance the probability of achieving that goal.

Jan 1, 1995

By Steven D. Sandbrook

A man by the name of Louis Binstock once said, “Too often the shortcut, the line of least resistance, is responsible for evanescent and unsatisfactory success.”

Jan 1, 2015

By T. Palangio

Most blasters wouldn’t think of initiating a shot without a seismograph to record vibration and air blast results. Some might even measure the velocity of detonation but few surprisingly record the event on video, photo document loading conditions or take pictures before and after the shot. This paper discusses digital imaging, the equipment, methods, techniques and information that can be learned from digital pictures taken in the field during blasting operations. The guy who said “a picture is worth a thousand words” probably understated it.

Jan 1, 2008

By Chad Ducey

The proper utilization of energy in an explosive column is of paramount importance to the success of any blast. Historically, Powder Factor (the weight of explosive per mass or volume of material to be blasted or its inverse), has dictated the blast design. The concept of Energy Factor is a more effective method to design a blast. In order to utilize explosives efficiently, the energy contained in any given product must be quantified. The Powder Factor method, although historically successful, assumes that a pound of cast pentolite affects the material to be blasted the same as a pound of ammonium nitrate / me1 oil (ANFO.) Years of experience and scientific testing have led the blaster in the field to believe otherwise. The next logical technological step is Energy Factor. The Energy Factor method that will be discussed in this paper takes into consideration not only the weight of the explosive, but also the weight strength (Cal/g) and the density (g/cc) to yield a constant relative Energy Factor. The result of such a method is a factor that can be used in the field exactly the same as Powder Factor, but that reflects the relative energy of any given product in terms that will reflect the relative cost benefit of that explosive selection. The Energy Factors associated with different available explosives make it possible to compare the difference in the amount of energy per loaded pound in each unit length of borehole. This paper will examine the concept of Energy Factor in an in depth manner and also compare this quantification method to that of Powder Factor. It will also demonstrate the value of using Energy Factor and how it can improve the efficiency of a blast design. The misconceptions that come along with using Powder Factor will be examined and comparisons will be made between boreholes loaded using Powder Factor and those that are loaded using Energy Factor. This paper will clearly define the differences between these blast design methods and allow the reader to realize the production, quality, and economic advantages of using the Energy Factor method.

Jan 1, 2000

By P D. Kasbanis, Lyall Workman

The energy output of an explosive is typically calculated using an equation of state and computer applications. Results are reported as weight and bulk strength, either in absolute terms or relative to ANFO. The effect of the equation of state selected and the assumptions regarding the energy calculation are considered and interpreted for the purpose of blast design. It appears that variations in the heat of detonation which result from the selection of the equation of state and parameters associated with it are not sufficient to significantly affect blast patterns, explosive consumption and costs. However variations stemming from the use of "available energy" associated with a cut-off pressure are significant, suggesting in many cases large pattern expansions. The validity of the various approaches is discussed and blast design results based on the energy calculated by the different approaches are presented and evaluated.

Jan 1, 1996

By Geoff Baldwin, Alastair C. Torrance

The use of monitors to assess equipment performance is carried out on a routine basis in many industries. The benefits gained through process control in knowing exactly how the equipment is working far outweigh the initial capital costs of the monitor. In the mining industry several dragline monitors have been developed and installed on equipment through out the world, but to date none has been fully accepted by the industry. This paper describes the use of a sophisticated monitoring system which incorporates an onboard processor to assess both dragline and blast performance. The use of a radio telemetry link for data transfer has removed the need for manual data collection and transfer, leading to a more efficient and powerful system. Significant effort has been put into the development and verification of a dig index to allow blast performance to be objectively assessed.

Jan 1, 1990

By Harry Verakis, Thomas Lobb

This paper is a summary and an update of the underground mine blasting accident investigations and studies previously conducted by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and the former US. Bureau of Mines. Blasting accidents are usually a small percentage of the total number of mining accidents. However, blasting accidents continue to occur and the severity of these accidents is disproportionately high with respect to other types of mining accidents. In 2000, about 5.7 billion pounds of explosives were produced in the USA. The mining industry consumed the greatest portion of explosives manufactured for blasting with about 67 percent used for coal mining. Metal and nonmetal mining operations account for about 23 percent of the use of explosives. The use of permissible explosives in underground coal mines continues to decline (3,373,069 pounds for 2000).

Jan 1, 2002

By Les W. Armstrong, Stephen B. Richardson, Neville T. Moxon

A study was carried out to determine how different degrees of stemming confinement, that is the retention of the explosives gases, effects fragmentation and movement during blasting.

Jan 1, 1993

By Richard Dooley

The purpose of this paper is to give a description of a controlled blasting program and why Georgia Power now has one; mainly because of the Spillway Project.

Jan 1, 1981