Search Documents

By J. C. Reed

CINNABAR was discovered in southwestern Arkansas on Little Missouri River in sec. 1, T.7S., R.26W., in April, 1930, and near Antoine Creek in sec. 28, T.6S., R.23W., some 15 miles farther east in May of the same year. It was not, however, until June, 1931, that cinnabar was identified as such in a specimen from the original discovery area sent to W. M. Weigel1 by Walter F. Hintze of Murfreesboro. Almost simultaneously2, in July, 1931, Moritz Norden of Hot Springs identified specimens from the Antoine Creek area as cinnabar. Immediate interest in the district followed the identification of cinnabar and by January, 1932, the district was known to extend as a mineralized belt about one mile wide trending east-northeast from sec. 13, T.7S., R.27W., in Howard County-across central Pike County and into Clark County to sec. 19, T.6S., R.23W., thence extending southeast into sections 33 and 34 of the same township. Since then, cinnabar has been found in sec. 6, T.7S., R.22W., thus giving a total east-west length to the district of approximately 30 miles. Interest focused mainly on the two discovery areas, with the result that mining development has progressed most rapidly in those localities. In the Antoine Creek area the Arkansas Quicksilver Co. has done con-siderable exploration work and has retorted the high-grade ore so .obtained. In the Little Missouri area the Southwestern Quicksilver Co. has had a 12-ton rotary furnace in more or less continuous operation since April, 1932, and has been the largest producer in the district.

Jan 1, 1935

By H. F. Seifert

THE classification and preparation of non-ferrous scrap metals is a subject of interest to every individual and corporation that employs in its processes of manufacture non-ferrous metals and alloys and accumulates in such manufacture scrap from these materials for disposition in the form of turnings, borings, short ends, punchings, clippings, grindings, washings, etc. All too frequently the disposition of such scrap is left to individuals who have no knowledge of the subject either from a metallurgical or a commercial standpoint, or both. Much money is thus lost which with a little more intelligent effort might be saved, and in this day of fierce competition and small profits such an opportunity cannot be ignored. The Mineral Resources of the United States for the year 1925, the latest issue available (Part 1, page 221), gives the secondary non-ferrous TABLE 1.-Some Secondary Non-ferrous Metals Recovered in the United States for the Year 1924-25 Material Short Tons Value Copper, including that in alloys other than brass.... 250,600 $ 71,170,400 Brass, scrap remelted 242,300 56,270,800 Lead as metal 112,4201 39,477,100 Lead as alloys 112,460 Zinc as metal 61,430 11,359,000 Zinc -in alloys other than brass 13,300 Tin as metal 1 7,950 35,165,400 Tin in alloys 23,000 Antimony as metal 1 } 3;794,000 Antimony in alloys 10,839 Aluminum as metal 17,700 24 Aluminum in alloys 26,300 ,816,000 Nickel as metal 19 1 1,518,000 Nickel in non-ferrous alloys 2,109 Total 882,600 $243,570,700

Jan 1, 1928

By H. F. Seifert

THE classification and preparation of non-ferrous scrap metals is a subject of interest to every individual and corporation that employs in its processes of manufacture non-ferrous metals and alloys and accumulates in such manufacture scrap from these materials for disposition in the form .of turnings, borings, short ends, punchings, clippings, grindings, washings, etc. All too frequently the disposition-of such scrap is left to individuals who have no knowledge of the subject either from a metallurgical or a commercial standpoint, or both. Much money is thus lost which with a little more intelligent effort might be saved, and in this day of fierce competition and small profits such an opportunity cannot be ignored. The Mineral Resources of the United States for the year 1925, the latest issue available (Part 1, page 221), gives the secondary non-ferrous TABLE 1.-Some. Secondary Non-ferrous Metals Recovered in the United States for the -Year 1924-25 Material Short Tons Value Copper, including that in alloys other than brass.... 250,600 8 71,170,400 Brass, scrap remelted : 242,300 56,270,800 Lead as metal : 112,420 39,477,100 Lead as alloys 112,460 Zinc as metal 61,430 11,359,000 Zinc in alloys other than brass 13,300 Tin as metal 7,950 Tin in alloys 23,000, 35,165,400 Antimony as metal 1 3,794,000 Antimony in alloys : 10,839 Aluminum as metal 17,700 24,816,000 Aluminum in alloys 26,300 Nickel as metal 191 1,518,000 Nickel in non-ferrous alloys 2,109 Total l 882,600 $243,570,700

Jan 1, 1928

By C. J. Guntner, R. P. Reed

A commercial 18Cr-8Ni iron alloy (AISI 304L) was examined in tension at 300°, 76°, 20°, and 4°K. Continuous stress-strain recordings were made, X-ray analyses at periodic stress (strain) intervals were obtained, and the magnetic measurements were taken. From this data the percentage of martensitic products [bcc(a) and hcp (E)] was computed as a function of stress (strain). It was found thatup to 15 pct E phase forms at low temperntures. The amount of E formed increases to a maximum at about 5 pct strain, then decreases. This decrease indicates the additional transformation of E to a'. The total amount of E and a' was suppressed at constant stress (strain) at 4°K as compared to 76°K. It is proposed that the suppression of E and a' is associated with the decreased mobility of extended dislocations at very low temperatures. The yield strength decreased as the temperature was depressed below room temperature and then increased rapidly near 4°K. SOME ferrous alloys which are austenitic (fcc ?) at room temperature appear to be unique in that two martensitic products (hcp e and bcc a') may form on cooling to lower temperatures or on application of mechanical stress. The most common room-temperature austenitic ferrous alloys are 18Cr, 8Ni stainless steels. Most aspects of the spontaneous transformations have been previously described for these steels.' Several previous papers have described special aspects of the stress-induced transformations at low temperatures for the stainless steels, such as the existence of the hcp phase (c) after straining at 76oK,2-7 the morphology after straining using electron microscopy,7 and the decrease in E at higher strains at 76oK.4 However, for a complete representation, one must know the stress-strain characteristics and the dependence of both martensitic products on applied stress and temperature. It is the intention of this paper to provide that documentation. To accomplish this, continuous stress vs strain recordings were made at four temperatures: 300°, 76", 20°, and 4°K for annealed AISI 304L (a commercial 18Cr-8Ni alloy). At periodic stress intervals at each temperature the integrated X-ray line intensity of a selected peak for each phase (y, E, and a') was measured. In addition, photomicrographs of the strained surfaces were taken and magnetic measurements were made. The magnetic readings can be directly converted into percent a'.',e With these measurements the percentage of each phase may be plotted as a function of stress (or strain) and test temperature. It was found that up to 15 pct E phase forms upon stressing the AISI 304L alloy at low temperatures. The E percentage increases abruptly after the alloy yields, but then decreases gradually at higher stresses. The rapid increase in e at 76°K is associated with an "easy-glide" portion of the stress-strain curve. The total amount of a' + .G is suppressed below 76°K at a constant stress or strain. The yield strength decreases down to 76°K but increases rapidly below 20°K. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Tensile test specimens were cut parallel to the rolling direction from 0.1-in.-thick sheet. Continuous stress vs strain recordings were obtained at each test temperature (300°, 76o, 20°, and 4°K) using equipment and methods described elsewhere.' The specimens which were used in the X-ray analysis were stressed to successive increments of strain at each temperature, analyzed at room temperature, then restressed at the test temperature. This procedure was repeated until approximately ten X-ray analyses had been performed with approximately 1.0 pct strain increments. The specimens had a reduced section 1 in. long, 1.2 in. wide, and 0.1 in. thick. They were electro polished prior to testing and after each strain increment. Table I lists the chemical composition, grain size, and hardness for the alloy which was used. This is the same alloy for which extensive mechanical-property tests3 and morphological studies of the spontaneous transformations' have previously been made. For the low-temperature tests (76o and 4°K) below the Ms temperature the specimens were initially cooled to the test temperature, held for 1/2 hr, then warmed and X-rayed at room temperature. The results are listed in Table 11. From earlier work8 it was known that additional transformation on the second cycle would be considerably less (-0.1 pct

Jan 1, 1964

COMMITTEES Committee on Arrangements DAVID H. BROWNE, Chairman LAWRENCE ADDICKS THOMAS T. READ P. E. BARBOUR BURR A. ROBINSON GEORGE D. BARRON F. T. RUBIDGE KARL EILERS E. MALTBY SHIPP LOUIS D. HUNTOON BRADLEY STOUGHTON H.A. MEGRAW EDWARD B. STURGIS ARTHUR L. WALKER

Jan 4, 1917

The following is an incomplete list of members and guests who called at Institute headquarters during the period June 10, 1919, to July 10, 1919. Anvil A. Anderson, Rapid City, S. D. Roy N. McBride, U. S. Army. R. Hay Anderson, Mexico City, Mex. R. S. McIntyre, Berkeley, Calif. W. A. Barnes, San Francisco, Calif. H. R. Maier, Brooklyn, N. Y. Bennett R. Bates, Denver, Colo. Wm. D. Mainwaring, Philadelphia, Pa. Harlan H. Bradt, Duluth, Minn. Wm. E. Milligan, Chrome, N. J. H. Brings, San Francisco, Calif. Willard S. Morse, Tacoma, Wash. Robert S. Burg, Ocean Park, Calif. Arthur Notman, Bisbee, Ariz. D. W. Butner, Congo Belge, Africa. P. Nugue, Chalon Sr. Saone, France. George A. Camphuis, El Paso, Tex. George A. Packard, Boston, Mass. Fred Canan, Denver, Colo. C. L. Petzel, New York City. Walter H. Coleman, Prescott, Ariz. V. Porreaud, Paris, France. Fred Crabtree, Pittsburgh, Pa. Fred S. Porter, Seattle, Wash. Ross E. Douglas, Rancagua, Chile. R. W. Prouty, Morenci, Ariz. F. A. Downes, Golden, Colo. Charles E. Prior, Brooklyn, N. Y. W. G. Eberhardt, Tucson, Ariz. Louis Ravicz, Minneapolis, Minn. Charles H. Fulton, Cleveland, Ohio. Wm. Reed, El Oro, Mexico. Wm. R. Grunow, New York City. E. J. Ristedt, Globe, Ariz. Orr R. Hamilton, Lansing, Mich. A. M. Rodgers, Middletown, N. Y. T. N. Havlin, St. Louis, Mo. J. C. Scoles, Salt Lake City, Utah. G. M. Henderson, Weston, Mass. C. E. Siebenthal, Washington, D. C.

Jan 8, 1919

By Hans Lundberg

Jan 1, 1927

Executive SIDNEY J. JENNINGS, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON J. E. JOHNSON, JR. EDWIN LUDLOW ROBERT M. RAYMOND Membership KARL FILERS, Chairman LEWIS W. FRANCIS J. E. JOHNSON, JR. LOUIS D. HUNTOON ARTHUR L. WALKER Finance GEORGE D. BARRON, Chairman CHARLES F. RAND BENJAMIN B. THAYER Library E. GYBBON SPILSBURY,1 Chairman ALEX C. HUMPHREYS3 GEORGE C. STONE 2 J. H. JANEWAY4 BRADLEY STOUGHTON

Jan 5, 1918

Executive SIDNEY J. JENNINGS, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON J. E. JOHNSON, JR. EDWIN LUDLOW ROBERT M. RAYMOND Membership KARL EILERS, Chairman LEWIS W. FRANCIS J. E. JOHNSON, JR. LOUIS D. HUNTOON ARTHUR L. WALKER Finance GEORGE D. BARRON, Chairman CHARLES F. RAND BENJAMIN B. THAYER Library E. GYBBON SPILSBURY,1 Chairman ALEX C. HUMPHREYS2 GEORGE C. STONE2 J. H. JANEWAY4 BRADLEY STOUGHTON1

Jan 3, 1918

United Engineering Trustees, Inc James L Head, '50 E C Meagher, '52 Gail F Moulton, '53 The Engineering Foundation E R Kaiser, '54 W M Peirne, '52 E C Meagher, ex officio as Pres , LET Engineering Societies Library Board James Douglas, '52 Frank T Sisno, '50 American Standards Association Mining Standardization Correlating Committee Otto Herres, '51 H H Otto, '51 B F Tillson, '50

Jan 1, 1952

By Cecil H. Desch

THE progress of metallurgical practice and the demands made by the engineering industry on our foundries and mills have made the crystalline structure of metals a subject of far more than academic interest. Metals and alloys are made up of crystals. Even if we accept the view, so ably maintained by some metallurgists, that the crystals are separated from one another by an amorphous layer, it remains true that all but a very minute fraction of any metallic mass is crystalline. The conditions which affect the growth of crystals are therefore of importance in metallurgy. It is not only castings whose properties depend on the arrangement of their crystals, for the more we learn of the behavior of forged, rolled and drawn metals, the more certain it becomes that it is profoundly influenced by the size and arrangement of the crystals in the original ingot, deter- mining a structure which may persist in a modified form through a long series of mechanical operations and annealings. This is mainly due to the concentration of much of the impurities in the last portions of the liquid to freeze, so that the boundaries between single crystals or groups of crystals are marked out by a zone of segregated material, differing in properties from the mass, and offering a barrier to diffusion and equalization of composition throughout the whole. The importance of this fact has been fully recognized by steel manufacturers, who have to deal with ingots which are sometimes very large, and are cast at a high temperature, containing impurities which have a marked effect on the properties even when present in very small quantity. For this reason the Iron and Steel Institute has set up a committee to examine the whole question of the heterogeneity of steel ingots,(l)f and a report has been issued, containing an account of the structure of 16 ingots, ranging in weight from 15 cwt. to 172 tons, each of which was sectioned and examined by chemical analysis and by etching. A valuable body of data concerning segregation has thus been collected. The work of the committee is being prosecuted with great activity, and at the same time researches are in progress to determine the physical

Jan 1, 1927

Executive SIDNEY .J. JENNINGS, Chairman GEORGE D. BAR HON .I. E. JOHNSON, JR. EDWIN LUDLOW ROBERT M. RAYMOND Membership KARL EILERS, chairman LEWIS W. FRANCIS .1. E. JOHNSON, JR. LOUIS D. HUNTOON ARTHUR. L. WALKER Finance GEORGE D. BARRON. Chairman. CHARLES F. RAND BENJAMIN B. THAYER Library E. GYBBON SPILSBURY1 Chairman ALEX C. HUMIPHREYS3 GEORGE C. STONE .J. H. JANEWAY4 BRADLEY STOUGHTON Papers and Publications BRADLEY STOUGHTON, Chairman

Jan 10, 1918

CONTENTS PAGE GEISMER, H. S.-Coal Washing Practice in Alabama. Discussed by William Kelly, H. S. Geismer, H. D. Pallister, L. E. Bryant, Milton H. Fies, Elmer F. Harris, James A. Barr, George G. Crawford, E. C. Wright, George S. Rice, R. V. Norris 1 MILLER, F. W.-Byproduct Coking in Alabama. Discussed by Theodore Swann 4 FIES, MILTON H.-Alabama Coal Mining Practice. Discussed by Milton 11. Fies, R. V. Norris, R. D. Hall, L. E. Bryant, George S. Rice, H. S. Geismer 5 MUSSEY, H. E.-Blast-furnace Practice in Alabama. Discussed by C. A. Meissner, Franklin H. Crockard, H. E. Mussey, W. H. Oldham 14 Coal Washing Practice in Alabama Discussion of paper of H. S. GEISMER, presented at the Birmingham Meeting, October 1924, and issued, as Paper No. 1363-C, with MINING AND METALLURGY, September, 1924. WILLIAM KELLY, Iron Mountain, Mich.-Is the dry-cleaning method used? H. S. GEISMER.-Neither the dry-cleaning process nor the Chance sand-liquid method has been tested in Alabama; but all other methods used for cleaning bituminous coal have been largely brought to perfection in this state. H. D. PALLISTER, Tuscaloosa, Ala.-Have you the results from the recent work on the tables with reference to fine coal? H. S. GEISMER.-None of the iron-producing companies has adopted the tables, though three commercial operators have installed tables within the last six months. I tried to learn the results, but they were not willing to release the data just now. At the mines producing domestic coal, fines present a difficult problem; until within the past six months all the fine coal was wasted. The operators are trying to recover some of it on the table. L. E. BRYANT, Rockwood, Tenn.-Is there any connection between the sulfur content of the sludge and the effect of the sludge on vegetation?

Jan 7, 1925

THE first session of the Institute was held at the Smithsonian Institution, on Tuesday evening, February 22d. The members were welcomed to Washington and to the Smithsonian by Prof. Joseph Henry. President Holley responded to the cordial welcome of Professor Henry, and then read an introductory address on the subject of Technical Education. Following the discussion on President Holley's address the following persons, duly proposed and indorsed by the Council, were elected members and associates of the Institute : MEMBERS. Emile R. Abadie, - St. Louis, Ma. R. J. Anderson, - Pittsburgh, Pa. Commander L. A. Beardslee, - Washington, D. C. Charles Bender, - New York City. Channing M. Bolton, - Richmond, Va. Thomas E. Bowman, - Silverton, Colorado. Calvin E. Brodhead, - Bethlehem, Pa. M. L. Brosius, - Lewistown, Pa. Harvey H. Brown, - Cleveland, Ohio. James A. Burden, - Troy, N. Y. J. P. Clemes, - Sonora, Mexico. N. H. Cone, - Nederland, Colorado. W. F. Durfee, - New York City. Robert Frazer, Jr., - Ashland, Pa. Joseph E. Galigher, - Bingham, Utah. William Golding, - Steel Works P. O., Pa. Samuel E. Griscom, - Pottsville, Pa. Gen. E. Burd Grubb, - Beverly, N. J. Arthur R. Guerard, - Charleston, S. C. Edward Hart, - Easton, Pa. Prof. Lewis M. Haupt, - Philadelphia. . R. S. Hawley, - Buffalo, N.Y. John W. Hoffman, - Philadelphia. Nelson P. Hulst, - Milwaukee, Wis. H. C. Humphrey, - Philadelphia. Ed. P. Jennings, - Ithaca, N. Y. B. F. Jones, - Pittsburgh, Pa.

Jan 1, 1876

(Members, are urged -to send in for this column any notes of interest concerning themselves or their fellow-members,). Members and guests R: ho called at Institute headquarters during the period Dec: 10, 1916 to Jan. 10, 1917: F. L. Antisell, Perth Amboy, N. J. William Kelly, Vulcan, Mich. F. J Brulé, Toronto, Ont., Canada. W. H. Lanagan, San Francisco, Cal. Zar T. Crittenden, The. Pas, Mau, Canada. S. Lefevre, Forest Glen, N Y Thomas F. Donnelly, Tucson, Ariz. ' D. A. Lyle, St..David's, Pa. - John Davenport, Brighton, 14 lass. -Domingo Nugués, Buenos Aires, Argon-. E. E. Ellis, Birmingham, Ala. tine. N. H. Emmons, 3d, Copperhill, Tenn. - H. L. Scaife, Clinton, S. C. W.. E. Erdofy, New York, N. Y. Mortimer A. Sears, Washington, D. C. C. L. French, New York, N. Y. E. Spurny, New York, N. Y.' , M. H. Gannon, Butte,. Mont. R. K. Stockwell, Santiago, Chile. R. E. Hoffman, Hannibal, Mo. Benjamin F. Tibby, Salt Lake City, Utah. C. Vey Holman, Rockland, Me. Arthur P. Watt, St. Francois, Mo. Arthur P. Allen has left the employ of the Calumet &- Hecla Mine and is now with the Highland Min. Co., Ashcroft, B. C., Canada. H: C. Bellinger has been appointed. general manager of the Chuqui- - c mata mine-of the Chile Exploration Co. -

Jan 2, 1917

Univ of Alabama-University, Alabama-Mining and Metallurgical Society William L Mason, Faculty Sponsor, E C Wright, Dept Head Univ of Alaska-College, Alaska-Mining Society of the Univ of Alaska Douglas W Huber, Faculty Sponsor, E H Beistline, Mining & Metallurgy Dept Head, Troy L Pewe, Geology Dept Head, James Crawford, Chapter Counselor Univ of Arizona-Tucson, Arizona-Miners Society Willard C Lacy, Faculty Sponsor, J D Forrester, Mining & Metallurgy Dept Head, F W Galbraith, Geology Dept Head Univ of California-Berkeley, California-Mineral Technology Association H E Hawkes, Faculty Sponsor, Joseph A Pask, Dept Head

Jan 1, 1959

[Univ. of Atabama-University, Alabama-Mining and Metallurgical Society. William L. Mason, Faculty Sponsor; E. C. Wright, Dept. Head. Univ. of Alaska-College, Alaska-Mining Society of the Univ. of Alaska. Douglas W. Huber, Faculty Sponsor; E. H. Beistline, Mining & Metallurgy Dept. Head; Troy L. Pewe, Geology Dept. Head; James Crawford, Chapter Counselor. Univ. of Arizona-Tucson, Arizona-Miners Society. Wiltard C. Lacy, Faculty Sponsor; J. D. Forrester, Mining & Metallurgy Dept. Head; F. W. Galbraith, Geology Dept. Head. Univ. of Catifornia-Berkeley, California-Mineral Technology Association. H. E. Hawkes; Faculty Sponsor; Joseph A: Pask, Dept. Head.]

Jan 1, 1961

The following is an incomplete list of members and guests who called at Institute headquarters during the period Jan. 10, 1918 to Feb. 10, 1919. Walter F. E. Barcus. Lt. C. K. McDonald, U. S. N. R. F. Capt. D. H. Bradley, Jr. Major John DeN. Macomb, Bayhead, N. J. Melvis Buigger. - Samuel Melitzer, New York City. Eugene Coste, Calgary, Can. T. C. Merriman, New Haven, Conn. C. W. Cromwell, Warren, Ariz. Wm. J. Millard, Tulsa, Okla. E. O. Daue. Benj. L. Miller, Bethlehem, Pa. Capt. H. W. Edmondson. S. B. Patterson, Jr., Allentown, Pa. E. W. Engelmann, Hayden, Ariz. Lynn L. Pomeroy, New York City. C. Mason Farnham. W. E. Pomeroy, New York City. Lt. C. W. Frith, Salt Lake City, Utah. G. M. Ponton, Ottawa, Ont. John T. Fuller, Honesdale, Pa. Wallace E. Pratt, Ft. Worth, Tex. Walter A. Funk, Idaho Sp., Colo. Harold L. Rau, Milwaukee, Wis. Major W. R. Grunow, New York, N..Y. Lt. E. J. Ristedt, Camp Merritt. A. W. Hackwood, Butte, Mont. George M. Ryall, Los Angeles, Cal. Lt. Nathaniel Herz, New Haven, Conn. D. B. Scott, Mogollon, N. M. Ralph T. Hirsh, New York City., W. H. Staver. O. P. Hood, Washington, D. C. Douglas B. Sterrett, Washington, D. C. E. B. Hopkins, Houston, Tex. J. A. Stewart, Minneapolis, Minn. Hugh C. Ingle, Pensacola, Fla. R. H. Summer, Wilmington, Del. Capt. Wm. F. Jahn. W. G. Swart, Duluth, Minn. Roswell H. -Johnson, Pittsburgh, Pa. Kirby Thomas, New York City. Jesse L. Jones, Pittsburgh. Pa. Capt. H. D. Trounce, San Diego, Cal. Edgar Kidwell, Berkeley, Cal. L. Unger, New York City. .D. H. Ladd, Detroit, Mich. George F. Vivian, Butte, Mont. Raymond B. Ladoo, Cambridge, Mass. R. A. Walter, Reading, Pa. W. H. Landers. Lt. R. G. Wayland, Chehalis, Wash. David Lasner, Elizabeth, N. J. R. J. White, Wallace, Idaho. J. M. Lilligren. J. S. Wroth, Albuquerque, N. M. Lt. Wm. J. Linn, Chicago, Ill. Herbert Hoover, General Pershing, Ambassador William G. Sharp and Admiral William S. Benson were speakers to-day at the annual luncheon in honor of Washington's Birthday, given by the American Club of Paris at the Palais D'Orsay.

Jan 3, 1919

THE LIFE and works of Alexander Agassiz, first president of the Calumet & Hecla Mining Co., were recalled to memory when a monument bearing his statue was unveiled in Agassiz Park, at Calumet, Mich., on Sept. 26, The statue is the work of Paul W. Bartlett, of New York, and was erected by George R. Agassiz, eldest son of Alexander Agassiz. We are indebted to Rodolphe L. Agassiz, now president of the Calumet & Hecla Consolidated, for the accompanying photograph of the statue. The principal address at the unveiling ceremony was delivered by Allen F. Rees, of Houghton, who said, in part: To the world at large Alexander Agassiz was preeminently the man of science. With all his devotion to the industrial life of this district, he found the time to devote to the con-tinuation of his work of scientific research which had been the life work of his fa-ther, Louis Agassiz. Not only did he acquire eminence for his scientific at-tainments and learn-ing, but he was recognized and hon-ored throughout the civilized world for his achievements and accomplishments in the realm of original research. His work in the fields of nat-ural science, in oceanography, in marine zoology, and in other similar lines of research, has added much to our knowledge of the world's mysteries. His life was one of accomplishment also in the industrial world. The union in one life of acknowledged achievement as a scientist and the accomplishment of great results in the prac-tical industrial world is a rare thing, and its possibility has never been exemplified in greater measure than in his life and its results.

Jan 11, 1923

By T. Sterry Hunt

THERE are about sixty bodies which chemists call elements ; the simplest forms of matter which they have been able to extract from the rocky crust of our earth, its waters, and its atmosphere. These substances are distributed in very unequal quantities, and in very different manners. As regards the frequency of these elements in nature, neglecting for the present those which constitute air and water, and confining ourselves to the solid matters of the earth's crust, there are a few which are exceedingly abundant, making up nine-tenths, if not ninety-five hundredths, of the rocks so far as known to us. The elements of which silica, alumina, lime, magnesia, potash, and soda are oxides, are very common, and occur almost everywhere. There are others which are much rarer, being found in comparatively small quantities. Many of these rarer elements are, however, of great importance in the economy of nature. Such are the common metals and other substances used in the arts, which occur in nature in quantities relatively very minute, but which have been collected by various agencies, and thus made available for the wants of man. It is chiefly of the well-known metals, iron, copper, silver, and gold, that I propose to speak to-night ; but there are two other elements not classed among the metals, which I shall notice for the reason that their history is extremely important, and will, moreover, enable , us to comprehend more clearly some points in that of the metals themselves. I speak of phosphorus and iodine. You all know the essential part which the former of these, com-