Papers - Treated Mine Timber at Operations of Lehigh Navigation Coal Company, Inc. (T. P. 1462, with discussion)

THOUGH at an earlier period brief studies had been made by the Lehigh Navigation Coal Company Inc., it was not until 1924 that J. B. Warriner, then general manager, called for a comprehensive study of timber treatment, treating solutions, and related operations. Because of the impossibility of procuring accurate costs and other pertinent treating data, the American Wood Preserving Co. agreed to treat a car of mine timber at the Port Reading plant of the Reading Railroad. Fig. I shows the treating data collected at the treating plant on this timber, which was installed in two of the Lehigh mines in 1925. Table i.—Results of Timber Survey in 1925 before Treated Timber Was Introduced Length of tunnels and gangways ft..... 522,987a Length of tunnels and gangways timbered, ft.................................. 224.880 Number of steel mine sets in use......... 2,412 Number of timber sets in use............ 63,834 Number of timber sets with evidence of rot 50: 419 Number of timber sets with evidence of squeeze..... ...................... I3,415 Percentage of all timber sets showing evidence of failure: BY wet rot........................ 6.0 By dry rot........................ 73.0 By squeeze....................... : Average life of wood set in Panther Valley, years............................... 5.3 • 99.05 miles. In the latter part of 1925, a survey of the tunnels and gangways of the company's Panther Valley mines was made to determine the proportion of gangways or tunnels timbered, cause of timber failures, approximate life of the average wood set and the approximate percentage of treated timber that it would be profitable for the company to use. Results of this survey appear in Table I. Because of the high percentage of timber that gave evidence of failure by rot, as noted in Table I, and a further study of the life of the sections where timbering was necessary, it was deemed advisable to fill 25 per cent of the yearly gangway timber requirement with treated timber. Quantities and Treatments OF Treated Timber Purchased In the early days of the program, none of the large treating companies would accept orders for small quantities of treated timber and the company was compelled to state the quantity of timber it would require at each operation in each month of the year. Table 2 is an example of the tabulation given to the various treating companies to assist them in making a yearly bid on the minimum quantity of timber required by the company during the year 1931. A bill of timber was calculated for each car, the weight of which would be between the minimum and maximum weight permitted for railroad-car loading. The treating company was paid for timber upon delivery at the operation specified. As extra cars of timber were required, they were ordered from the treating company, and payment was required On their receipt, on the basis of the piece or tonnage